Self-Defence and the Right to Life

@article{Ashworth1975SelfDefenceAT,
  title={Self-Defence and the Right to Life},
  author={Andrew J. Ashworth},
  journal={Cambridge Law Journal},
  year={1975},
  volume={34},
  pages={282-307}
}
  • A. Ashworth
  • Published 1975
  • Political Science
  • Cambridge Law Journal
It is almost a matter of definition that law restricts the freedom of each individual to satisfy his wants and desires in any manner he wishes. The restrictive elements in law may be regarded as justifiable because and in so far as they are necessary to ensure the maximum freedom for each and every individual. Freedom from interference can only be preserved by restricting everyone's freedom to exercise power over others. Perhaps the most fundamental and universal restriction is that placed on… Expand
Interpreting the Contours of Self-Defence within the Boundaries of the Rule of Law, the Common Law and Human Rights
The Crime and Courts Act 2013 has amended s. 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 on the amount of force a person can use in self-defence. The amended provision poses a dilemma for theExpand
Is there a “right” to self‐defense?
The use of defensive force, even deadly force, in protection of self or others (hereinafter "self-defense") is a paradigm of moral and legal permissibility. However, just why this is so has turnedExpand
Defences for Battered Women Who Kill
Recent articles on legal theory suggest that the concepts 'standpoint'1 and 'perspective'2 may be useful in probing certain issues. The idea is to recognize a pluralism of views, values, interests,Expand
Harm, Culpability and Criminal Liability: A Study of Justification and Excuse in Common Law Jurisprudence
This article examines the issue of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction between justification and excuse. By contrast with German and other Continental criminal law systems, theExpand
JUSTIFICATIONS AND CONCEPT OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN
This paper aims at investigating possible dimensions of justifications and excuses from criminal liability stemming from the Shari’a law, including categories of criminal intent, issues relating toExpand
Defences to Murder: A Woman-Centred Analysis
This thesis has developed a woman-centred analytical framework and accompanying court room strategy to critically evaluate the legal construction of abused women who kill and their reactions to abuseExpand
The use of private military and security companies in armed conflicts and certain peace operations: legal limits and responsibility
This thesis examines the explicit and implicit limits under international law on the use of private military and security companies (PMSCs) in armed conflict and peace operations. Having concludedExpand
The Applicability of the Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) Model to Gay Males and Lesbian Women Who Kill Their Intimate Batterers in Self-defence
The defence of self-defence, like much of the common law, has strongly male-centric origins and emphases. Judges and juries have little difficulty understanding the theory of the case presented toExpand
Whether to Save a Robot or a Human: On the Ethical and Legal Limits of Protections for Robots
  • Kamil Mamak
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • 2021
TLDR
It is demonstrated that current legal systems prioritize human beings and even force the active protection of humans, and two recommendations in terms of robot design are proposed to ensure the supremacy of human life over that of humanoid robots. Expand
A Feminist Critique of Self-Defense and Provocation in Battered Women's Cases in England and Wales
This paper critically examines the law of self-defense and provocation in cases where battered women kill their partners. It is argued that neither self-defense nor provocation adequately recognizesExpand
...
1
2
3
...