Seemingly minor changes to a questionnaire can make a big difference to mean scores: a cautionary tale

Abstract

It is not unusual for researchers to make apparently minor modifications to existing instruments without checking if this alters psychometric properties. Equivalent items on child mental health from two different versions of the Rutter parent questionnaire were compared: items from the standard version and from a modified version. The parents of 400 children aged 5–7 years were randomised into two groups: each group completed one version of the Rutter as well as an independent measure of psychopathology (the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; SDQ). The mean psychopathology scores of the two groups were comparable according to the SDQ but differed markedly between the two Rutter versions, principally because of changes in the response categories. Nevertheless, the validity of the two versions of the Rutter was similar as judged from Rutter-SDQ correlations. Seemingly minor changes in the wording of a measure can have a major impact on mean scores, thereby making it harder to compare or combine the results of studies using the original and the modified measure.

DOI: 10.1007/s00127-007-0169-0

4 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0501002008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

102 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 102 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Goodman2007SeeminglyMC, title={Seemingly minor changes to a questionnaire can make a big difference to mean scores: a cautionary tale}, author={Robert Goodman and Alessandra C. Iervolino and Stephan M. Collishaw and Andrew Pickles and Barbara Maughan}, journal={Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology}, year={2007}, volume={42}, pages={322-327} }