Security and Freedom After September 11
@article{Banks2010SecurityAF, title={Security and Freedom After September 11}, author={C. Banks}, journal={Public Integrity}, year={2010}, volume={13}, pages={24 - 5} }
Preventing terrorism is a high priority after September 11, but few studies have investigated the limitations and costs of prosecuting suspects under antiterror laws. This article examines PATRIOT Act oversight and its relationship to prosecutions. Three topics are analyzed—the Act's origins and oversight provisions, along with major criticisms; trends in antiterrorism prosecutions and convictions; and inspector general oversight of the act—together with the ethical implications of using… CONTINUE READING
7 Citations
U.S. District Court Decision-Making in USA PATRIOT Act Cases after September 11
- Political Science
- 2014
- 8
The data privacy / national security balancing paradigm as applied in the USA and Europe: Achieving an acceptable balance
- Political Science
- 2017
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 69 REFERENCES
In Pursuit of Justice: Prosecuting Terrorism Cases in the Federal Courts -- 2009 Update and Recent Developments
- Political Science
- 2009
- 11
- PDF
The Law: The Impact of Antiterrorism Policies on Separation of Powers: Assessing John Ashcroft's Role
- Political Science
- 2002
- 10
The Patriot Act's Institutional Story: More Evidence of Congressional Ambivalence
- Political Science
- 2007
- 7
Congressional Oversight Over-looked: Police Patrol versus Fire Alarms
- Political Science, Engineering
- 1984
- 2,070
- PDF