Securitization, Social Identity, and Democratic Security: Nixon, India, and the Ties That Bind

  title={Securitization, Social Identity, and Democratic Security: Nixon, India, and the Ties That Bind},
  author={Jarrod Landin Hayes},
  journal={International Organization},
  pages={63 - 93}
  • J. Hayes
  • Published 1 January 2012
  • Political Science
  • International Organization
Abstract The Democratic Peace stands as one of the most coherent and recognizable programs of study in international relations. Yet despite the pages of research devoted to the subject and claims about its law-like nature, the democratic peace remains a highly contested finding. In large part, this contestation arises out of an enduring question: What exactly keeps democracies from fighting? Drawing on the securitization theory of the Copenhagen School as well as social psychology, this article… 
Identity, Authority, and the British War in Iraq
Despite the lack of an obvious threat to Britain, the Blair government invaded Iraq in 2003 alongside the United States. This article draws on securitization theory and social identity approaches
A human rights tragedy: strategic localization of US foreign policy in Colombia
  • S. Regilme
  • Political Science
    International Relations
  • 2018
How and to what extent do ideas and political discourses shape bilateral cooperation between a powerful state and its weaker ally? Why do weaker states act in ways that diverge from the expectations
Demographics, Perceptions & the Weakening Securitisation of the US-Mexico Border
Once peaceful and relatively neglected, the border zone between the United States (US) and Mexico has altered radically in the last two decades. Today, the border is one of the most frequently
The Securitization Dilemma
Motivated by the neglect of uncertainty and perverse consequences in constructivist studies of security, this article pursues a reconceptualization of the security dilemma. Approaching the dilemma
Great Powers, Hierarchy, and Endogenous Regimes: Rethinking the Domestic Causes of Peace
  • P. McDonald
  • Political Science
    International Organization
  • 2015
Abstract This paper blends recent research on hierarchy and democratization to examine the theoretical and empirical costs of treating regime type exogenously in the literature most identified with
Covert Operations, Wars, Detainee Destinations, and the Psychology of Democratic Peace
We explore US covert forcible actions against democratic governments and their citizens and show that interdemocratic use of covert force is common and can be accommodated within the theory of
Securitisation and the production of international order(s)
How do securitisation moves affect a nation’s foreign policy agenda? This article (re-)directs critical security studies’ attention to the discipline’s core concern with interstate relations. Drawing
‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases
Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance
The perils of realist advocacy and the promise of securitization theory: Revisiting the tragedy of the Iraq War debate
Why does realist political advocacy for a more limited national security agenda fail? For nearly two decades, realists in general and Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer in particular have publicly
No sympathy for the devil: Emotions and the social construction of the democratic peace
Constructivists claim that the democratic peace is socially constructed via mutual recognition between liberal subjects. Mutual recognition is rooted in shared moral attitudes and cognitive


Identity and Securitization in the Democratic Peace: The United States and the Divergence of Response to India and Iran's Nuclear Programs
While almost a decade old, Ted Hopf’s observation that the democratic peace is an observation in search of a theory still holds validity. In particular, the mechanisms behind the democratic peace are
The Discipline of the Democratic Peace:
The theory that democratic states do not go to war with one another depends upon the claim that such states can recognize each other as democracies and act pacifically in accordance with this
The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context
It is argued that a speech act view of security does not provide adequate grounding upon which to examine security practices in ‘real situations’, and three basic assumptions are put forward that an effective securitization is audience-centered, context-dependent and power-laden.
Securitization and the Construction of Security
This article argues that while an important and innovative contribution, the securitization framework is problematically narrow in three senses, and points to possibilities for developing the framework further as well as for the need for those applying it to recognize both limits of their claims and the normative implications of their analysis.
How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace
democracies seldom if ever go to war against one another has nearly become a truism. The ”democratic peace” has attracted attention for a number of reasons. It is “the closest thing we have to an
Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics
The theory of “securitization” developed by the Copenhagen School provides one of the most innovative, productive, and yet controversial avenues of research in contemporary security studies. This
Democratic Peace -- Warlike Democracies?: A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument
The liberal argument that democratic political structures form a precondition for stable peace orders in international relations has become conventional wisdom among Western policy-makers. Immanuel
A Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Peace: The Ambiguous Case of the Spanish-American War
This article uses the Spanish-American War, one of the only possible cases of war between democracies, to demonstrate the power of a constructivist approach for explaining the liberal peace. A
The Democratic Peace is What States Make of It: A Constructivist Analysis of the US-Indian ‘Near-Miss’ in the 1971 South Asian Crisis
In 1971, the United States and India — the world’s two largest democracies — almost went to war in a ‘near-miss’ at odds with the hypothesis that democracies do not fight one another. In this
The Theory of Democratic Peace and Threat Perception
President Franklin D. Roosevelt's assessment of Hitler as a potential threat to American security in the aftermath of the Munich crisis highlights the role of liberal-democratic norms in shaping the