Section 702 and the Collection of International Telephone and Internet Content

@article{Donohue2015Section7A,
  title={Section 702 and the Collection of International Telephone and Internet Content},
  author={L. Donohue},
  journal={Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy},
  year={2015},
  volume={38},
  pages={117}
}
  • L. Donohue
  • Published 2015
  • Business
  • Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) authorizes the NSA to collect the electronic communications of non-U.S. targets located overseas. Recent media reports and declassified documents reveal a more extensive program than publicly understood. The article begins by considering the origins of the current programs and the relevant authorities, particularly the transfer of part of the post-9/11 President’s Surveillance Program to FISA. It outlines the contours of the 2007… Expand
The Discriminatory Executive & the Rule of Law
Today, the executive enjoys unprecedented power, particularly in the area of national security. By and large, this authority is not meaningfully restrained by Congress or the courts. However, someExpand
The US Legal System on Data Protection in the Field of Law Enforcement. Safeguards, Rights and Remedies for EU Citizens.
At the request of the LIBE Committee of the European Parliament, this study surveys the U.S. system of data protection in the field of federal law enforcement. Since the legal category of “dataExpand
Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency's Civil Liberties Gap
This paper examines the National Security Agency, its compliance with legal constraints and its respect for civil liberties. But even if perfect compliance could be achieved, it is too paltry a goal.Expand
Correlation and Constitutional Rights
Skepticism among American scholars about the value of analytic legal positivism stems in part from the pervasiveness of private law in analytic jurisprudence. Wesley Hohfeld’s influential frameworkExpand
The Essence of the Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection: Finding the Way Through the Maze of the CJEU’s Constitutional Reasoning
Abstract In the constitutional shaping of the concept of essence of fundamental rights, the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU” or “the Court”) in the field of privacy and dataExpand
They See you and yet you Don't See them: Privacy in the Multilayered National Surveillance State Realm: A Dystopian Digital Society?
TLDR
This paper avowedly asserts that in such cases consumers (pursuant a data breach) have a natural right to seek redress and compensation from courts based on the damage of loss of chance of exclusive control of one´s personal data. Expand
Terrorism and Democratic Recession
This short essay examples the potential causal mechanisms that might link terrorism to democratic decline. That causal pathway is often asserted in political rhetoric about terrorism — but suchExpand
U.S. Individuals' Perceptions of Government Electronic Surveillance After Passage of the USA Patriot Act
U.S. Individuals’ Perceptions of Government Electronic Surveillance After Passage of the USA Patriot Act
Lawful Hacking: Toward a Middle Ground Solution to the Going Dark Problem
Cyberspace and Cybersecurity; Cyberspace and Cybersecurity/Policy and strategy; Law and justice/Legislation; Intelligence; Infrastructure protection/Computer networks; Technology/InformationExpand
Legal Implications of Data Mining: Assessing the European Union's Data Protection Principles in Light of the United States Government's National Intelligence Data Mining Practices
This dissertation addresses some of the data protection challenges that have arisen from globalization, technological progress, terrorism and seamless cross-border flows of personal data.  The focuExpand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
The Fourth Amendment and the Global Internet
This Article considers how Fourth Amendment law should adapt to the global nature of Internet surveillance. It focuses on two types of problems not yet addressed by courts. First, the Supreme Court’sExpand
available at http://www.nctc.gov/docs/ NCTCWhitePaperOverviewofNCTC2012AGGBaselineSafeguards050114.pdf [http://perma
  • VAJ7-Q4Y2]. 608. NAT'L COUNTERTERRORISM CTR., ATTORNEY GENERAL GUIDELINES, supra note 607 re Sealed Case
  • 2011
307. See supra Part II.A.6. 308. See, e.g., 154 CONG. REC. H5757 Dir. Of Nat'l Intelligence, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker, House of Representatives); 154 CONG. REC. H5740 (daily ed
  • 307. See supra Part II.A.6. 308. See, e.g., 154 CONG. REC. H5757 Dir. Of Nat'l Intelligence, to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker, House of Representatives); 154 CONG. REC. H5740 (daily ed
  • 2008
Director of National Intelligence); see also 154 Director of National Intelligence , to Hon
  • National Security Investigations and Prosecutions 116. Open/Closed Hearing: FISA Before the S. Select Comm. on Intelligence, 110th Cong
  • 2007
United States v. Stokes, 710 F.Supp. 2d 689 United States v. Esparza-Mendoza, 265 F
  • aff'd 726 F.3d 880 (7th Cir Utah 2003), aff'd 386 F.3d 953 (10th Cir. 2004); United States v. Guitterez, 983 F.Supp. 905, 912 (N.D. Cal. 1998), rev'd on other grounds, 203 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 1999) (unpublished). 436. See Kerr, supra note 434. 437. 459 F.3d 618
  • 2003
concurring). 511. 414 U.S. at 232 (quoting People v. Chiagles, 237 N.Y. 193, 197, 142 N.E. 583, 584 (1923)). 512. Id.; see, e.g., Chandler v. Miller, 520 U
  • 516. Harold J. Krent, Of Diaries and Data Banks: Use Restrictions Under the Fourth Amendment, 74 TEX. L. REV. 49
  • 1995
Aristotle/politics.1.one.html [http://perma.cc/ERW5-T3AC]; available in the Original Greek at http
  • Aristotle/politics.1.one.html [http://perma.cc/ERW5-T3AC]; available in the Original Greek at http
  • 1990
Warrantless electronic surveillance has been used by the Executive to collect intelligence information since at least the mid-1800s. " ). 458. See, e.g., United States v
  • Warrantless electronic surveillance has been used by the Executive to collect intelligence information since at least the mid-1800s. " ). 458. See, e.g., United States v
  • 1985
Reply Brief for the Petitioners at 15, Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA
  • Reply Brief for the Petitioners at 15, Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA