Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

@article{Baas2020ScopusAA,
  title={Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies},
  author={Jeroen Baas and Michiel Schotten and Andrew M. Plume and Gr{\'e}goire C{\^o}t{\'e} and Reza Karimi},
  journal={Quantitative Science Studies},
  year={2020},
  volume={1},
  pages={377-386}
}
Scopus is among the largest curated abstract and citation databases, with a wide global and regional coverage of scientific journals, conference proceedings, and books, while ensuring only the highest quality data are indexed through rigorous content selection and re-evaluation by an independent Content Selection and Advisory Board. Additionally, extensive quality assurance processes continuously monitor and improve all data elements in Scopus. Besides enriched metadata records of scientific… 

Author Database of Standardized Citation Indicators Derived from Scopus Lacks Transparency and Suggests a False Precision

A critical discussion is presented for the Author Metrics Database (AMD) created by Ioannides et al. (2016, 2020) containing citation-based indicators for 165,000 authors publishing in journals

Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions

TLDR
This study conducted a large scale and thorough comparison between the data collected from the journal publisher’s website and these two bibliographic databases and identified four main representative causes for the discrepancies.

Assessment of Literature on Webometrics Published in the Scopus-Elsevier Database from 2003 - 2019

Original Research Article To evaluate, year-wise, document types, subject-wise classification, authorship pattern, language pattern, and collaboration of countries in research productivity of

Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World

TLDR
An all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place is provided.

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

TLDR
This paper investigates 3,073,351 citations found by these six data sources to 2,515 English-language highly-cited documents published in 2006 from 252 subject categories, expanding and updating the largest previous study.

Accuracy of funding information in Scopus: a comparative case study

TLDR
Scopus needs to optimize the funding acknowledgement text identification method and improve the funding agency extraction and standardization strategy and it is shown that the accuracy of funding information collected by Web of Science is better than that of Scopus.

A bibliometric study on library and information science and information systems literature during 2010–2019

PurposeStudying the nature of research progress in interrelated research domains is important for evaluating the research productivity and to understand the current trends of the area of research.

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

TLDR
A large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic highlights the importance of combining a comprehensive coverage of the scientific literature with a flexible set of filters for making selections of the literature.

The Journal Coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A Comparative Analysis

TLDR
The results indicate that the databases have significantly different journal coverage, with the Web of Science being most selective and Dimensions being the most exhaustive.

Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels

TLDR
It is found that close to half of all documents in Dimensions are not associated with any country of affiliation while the proportion of documents without this data in Scopus is much lower, which affects the possibilities that Dimensions can offer as instruments for carrying out bibliometric analyses at the country and institutional level.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 71 REFERENCES

Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models

TLDR
Based on data gathered from Scopus, field-specific excellence can be identified in institutions where highly-cited papers have been frequently published.

ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact

TLDR
It is shown that ResearchGate is dominated by recent articles, which attract about three times as many views as older articles and has low to moderate positive correlations with both Scopus citations and Mendeley readers, which is consistent with them tending to reflect a wider audience than Scopus‐publishing scholars.

Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI

Using the Scopus dataset (1996–2007) a grand matrix of aggregated journal-journal citations was constructed. This matrix can be compared in terms of the network structures with the matrix contained

Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study

Interdisciplinary collaboration is a major goal in research policy. This study uses citation analysis to examine diverse subjects in the Web of Science and Scopus to ascertain whether, in general,

A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field

TLDR
This database is a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm- index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator.

A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists

  • V. Aman
  • Computer Science
    Scientometrics
  • 2018
This study introduces a new bibliometric approach to study the effects of international scientific mobility on knowledge transfer. It is based on an analysis of internationally mobile and

The influence of highly cited papers on field normalised indicators

TLDR
The results show that MNLCS is influenced by outliers, as measured by kurtosis, but at a much lower level than MNCS, and future field normalised calculations should explicitly address the influence of outliers in their methods and reporting.

A system for generating research impact visualizations over medical research groups

TLDR
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library has developed a system for generating research impact visualizations for research groups within the newly established Carle Illinois College of Medicine, using the Elsevier Scopus database and Applications Programming Interface.
...