Corpus ID: 204961230

Scooped! Estimating Rewards for Priority in Science∗

  title={Scooped! Estimating Rewards for Priority in Science∗},
  author={Ryan Hill and Carolyn Stein},
The scientific community assigns credit or “priority” to individuals who publish an important discovery first. We examine the impact of losing a priority race (colloquially known as getting “scooped”) on subsequent publication and career outcomes. To do so, we take advantage of data from structural biology where the nature of the scientific process together with the Protein Data Bank — a repository of standardized research discoveries — enables us to identify priority races and their outcomes… Expand
The Rise of Research Teams: Benefits and Costs in Economics
E conomics research is increasingly a team activity: economists increasingly coauthor their papers, and these coauthored papers have a large and increasing impact advantage. This “rise of teams”Expand
Scientific Grant Funding
This chapter provides an overview of grant funding as an innovation policy tool aimed at both practitioners and science policy scholars. We first discuss how grants relate to other contractualExpand
Idea Twins: Simultaneous Discoveries as a Research Tool
Over half a century after Merton’s (1963) description of simultaneous discoveries “as a strategic research site” for social science, they are hardly ever studied. This paper illustrates the potentialExpand
Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences
An overview of current challenges facing preprints, both technical and social, and a vision for their future development are provided. Expand
Internalizing Externalities: Designing Effective Data Policies
* Hill: Department of Economics, MIT (email: ryanhill@; Stein: Department of Economics, MIT (email:; Williams: Department of Economics, Stanford University (email:Expand
The Private Impact of Public Data: Landsat Satellite Maps Increased Gold Discoveries and Encouraged Entry
How does public data shape the relative performance of incumbents and entrants in the private sector? Using a simple theoretical framework, I argue that public data reduces investment uncertainty, ...


The Matthew effect in science funding
The results show that winners just above the funding threshold accumulate more than twice as much funding during the subsequent eight years as nonwinners with near-identical review scores that fall just below the threshold, suggesting that early funding itself is an asset for acquiring later funding. Expand
Simultaneous Discoveries as a Research Tool: Method and Promise
Nearly half a century after Merton’s description of simultaneous discoveries "as a strategic research site" (Merton 1963), they are hardly ever used by social scientists. Although their promise as aExpand
The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research
  • R. Nelson
  • Economics
  • Journal of Political Economy
  • 1959
R ECENTLY, orbiting evidence of unAmerican technological competition has focused attention on the role played by scientific research in our political economy. Since Sputnik it has become almost triteExpand
Matthew: Effect or Fable?
This work estimates the effect of a scientist becoming a Howard Hughes Medical Institute HHMI Investigator on citations to articles the scientist published before the prize was awarded and finds evidence of a postappointment citation boost, but the effect is small and limited to a short window of time. Expand
What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals
Abstract We study editorial decisions using anonymized submissions matched to citations at four leading economics journals. We develop a benchmark model in which editors maximize the expected qualityExpand
Early-career setback and future career impact
Comparing junior scientists who were awarded a NIH grant to those with similar track records, who were not, and find that individuals with the early setback systematically performed better in the longer term are consistent with the concept that “what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger. Expand
Toward a new economics of science
Abstract Science policy issues have recently joined technology issues in being acknowledged to have strategic importance for national ‘competitiveness’ and ‘economic security’. The economicsExpand
Reputation and Earnings: The Roles of Quality and Quantity in Academe
We examine the determinants of professional reputation. Does quantity of exposures raise reputation independent of quality? Does quality of the most important exposure have extra effects onExpand
How Does the Market Use Citation Data? The Hirsch Index in Economics
A large literature following Hirsch (2005) has proposed citation-based indexes that could be used to rank academics. This paper examines how well several such indexes match labor market outcomesExpand
Preemption, Leapfrogging, and Co­mpetition in Patent Races
Abstract This paper investigates when patent races will be characterized by vigorous competition and when they will degenerate into a monopoly. Undersome conditions, a firm with an arbitrarily smallExpand