Scientific Misconduct.

  title={Scientific Misconduct.},
  author={Charles Gross},
  journal={Annual review of psychology},
  • C. Gross
  • Published 2016
  • Geology
  • Annual review of psychology
Scientific misconduct has been defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Scientific misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science. The US government began to take systematic interest in such misconduct in the 1980s. Since then, a number of studies have examined how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific misconduct or were involved in it. Although the studies vary considerably in their methodology and in the nature and size of their samples, in most… 

Scientific Misconduct in Psychology: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Estimates and New Empirical Data

Spectacular cases of scientific misconduct have contributed to concerns about the validity of published results in psychology. In our systematic review, we identified 16 studies reporting prevalence

A Narrative on The Fabrication of Results in Science

Data fabrication is an act of scientific misconduct that affects its transparency and veracity. In this study we identify the main data fabrication problems in scientific research and suggest

Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain

Researchers associated the spread of these misconducts with the research evaluation model applied in Spain and perceived a high prevalence of duplicate publication and self-plagiarism and use of personal influence, in contrast to a low perceived incidence of data falsification or fabrication.

An Exploration on Ethical Challenge of Scientific Misconduct in Publication of Medical Papers: Examples, Causes of plagiarism, and Practical Strategies to prevent it

Introduction: One of the most important ethical challenges in research and academic writing is the scientific misconduct which is defined as violation of scientific regulations. The aim of this study

Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct

The views of researchers on the significance of raising concerns about scientific misconduct in their work environment and the reasons or circumstances that might deter them from doing so are described and discussed.

Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities

Research misconduct is harmful because it threatens public health and public safety, and also undermines public confidence in science. Efforts to eradicate ongoing and prevent future misconduct are

Intellectual theft: pitfalls and consequences of plagiarism

As Editors-in-Chief of Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, this paper addresses concerns of plagiarism raised by Associate Editors and/or ad hoc referees.

Research Misconduct in Business and Management Studies: Causes, Consequences, and Possible Remedies

This article analyses 131 articles that have been retracted from peer-reviewed journals in business and management studies. We also draw from six in-depth interviews: three with journal editors

Street research market: dealing with scientific misconduct in Iran

This study revealed some misconduct in scientific activities which has persuaded the authorities to enforce strict rules to deal with it and the effectiveness of this legislation needs to be investigated in some further studies.

Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors

There is need to identify, acknowledge, and generate awareness among junior researchers or postgraduate students to curb scientific misconduct and adopt Good Publication Practices (GPP).



Repairing research integrity

It is argued that science can and should clean up its act, and six strategies to that end are recommended, and extrapolation from the survey predicts that over 2,300 observations of potential misconduct are made yearly.

Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature

  • A. CasadevallR. SteenF. Fang
  • Biology
    FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
  • 2014
This analysis has identified major problems in the mechanisms used to rectify the scientific literature and suggests a need for action by the scientific community to adopt protocols that ensure the integrity of the publication process.

What Is Research Misconducts? Publication Ethics Is as Important as Research Integrity

Research ethics are mainly of two fields; research integrity and publication ethics. Research misconducts can occur at both areas. Examples of the research integrity violations are falsification,

A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics

The authors conclude that while the apparent ineffectiveness of past ethics instruction does not preclude the possibility that more systematic training may be useful, it does underscore the need to assess the efficacy of training activities.

Betrayers of the Truth

The timeliness of Betrayers of the Truth is exemplified by the recent exposure of John Darsee's faked experimental data, and the book reads like a detective story as it chronicles the infamous career.

A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature

The scope and characteristics of retracted articles across the full spectrum of scholarly disciplines were surveyed, and 15 prolific individuals accounted for more than half of all retractions due to alleged research misconduct, and strongly influenced all retraction characteristics.

The Persistence of Fraud in the Literature: The Darsee Case.

The incidence of fraud, or scientific misconduct, has been much publicized of late. While not new, the case of John Darsee has played an important part in the literature of biomedical research for a

Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?

  • R. Steen
  • Medicine
    Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 2010
The results suggest that papers retracted because of data fabrication or falsification represent a calculated effort to deceive, and it is inferred that such behaviour is neither naïve, feckless nor inadvertent.

Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?

Lower barriers to publication of flawed articles are seen in the increase in number and proportion of retractions by authors with a single retraction and an increase in retraction for “new” offenses such as plagiarism and a decrease in the time-to-retraction of flawed work.

Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.

Retracted articles continue to be cited as valid work in the biomedical literature after publication of the retraction; these citations signal potential problems for biomedical science.