Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences:

  title={Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences:},
  author={Laurence D. Smith and Lisa A. Best and D. Alan Stubbs and John Johnston and Andrea Bastiani Archibald},
  journal={Social Studies of Science},
  pages={73 - 94}
Studies comparing the cognitive status of the sciences have long sought to identify the distinguishing features of `hard' and `soft' science. Attempts by philosophers of science to ground such distinctions in abstract principles and by sociologists of science to detect relevant differences (for example, in consensus levels) have met with limited success. However, recent investigations of scientists' concrete practices of data representation provide new leads on this problem. In particular… 
Constructing knowledge. The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology.
Enhanced "graphicacy" among psychologists could contribute to the progress of psychological science by providing alternatives to significance testing and by facilitating communication across subfields.
Visual Inscriptions in the Scientific Hierarchy
Previous research has shown that the level of graph use in science journals is linearly related to the hardness of disciplines, confirming Bruno Latour’s “graphism” thesis that graphs are central to
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
These results support the scientific status of the social sciences against claims that they are completely subjective, by showing that, when they adopt a scientific approach to discovery, they differ from the natural sciences only by a matter of degree.
When reading conflicting science-related texts, rea ders may attend to cues which allow them to assess plausibility. One such plausibility cue is t he use of graphs in the texts, which are regarded
On Disciplinary Fragmentation and Scientific Progress
It is found that fragmentation critically limits scientific progress and is increased and progress limited if the simulated scientists are open to influence only by peers with very similar views, or when within-school diversity is lost.
Scientific Status of Disciplines, Individuals, and Ideas: Empirical Analyses of the Potential Impact of Theory
The place of theory in scientific research can be subjected to empirical investigation. This possibility is illustrated by examining three issues. First, what determines a scientific discipline's
All That Is Solid: Bench- Building at the Frontiers of Two Experimental Sciences
This article is the first comparative ethnography of a natural science (molecular biology) and a social science (psychology) and it highlights important differences between the fields, which suggests an alternative conception of the natural/social divide.
Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences
Psychology's standing within a hypothesized hierarchy of the sciences was assessed in a 2-part analysis. First, an internally consistent composite measure was constructed from 7 primary indicators of
A Hard Science is Good to Find Textual Similarity as a Measure of Scientific Paradigm Development , A Preliminary Investigation
The notion of a “hierarchy of sciences”, in which academic fields can be ordered from “hard” to “soft”, is an old one. However, efforts to develop a measure of hardness of a field—the field’s level


Why are graphs so central in science?
It is argued that statistical graphs use in problem solving analysis can best be understood in an ‘interactionist’ frame of analysis, including bio-emotion, culture, social organization, and environment as elements.
The Hierarchy of the Sciences?
  • S. Cole
  • Education
    American Journal of Sociology
  • 1983
For 200 years it has been assumed that the sciences are arranged in a hierarchy, with developed natural sciences like physics at the top and social sciences like sociology at the bottom. Sciences at
Social Science Methodology
Social science methodology has virtually exploded in the past 25 years. While the growth in methodological developments has been roughly exponential for the social sciences in general, it is clear
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
This highly original work presents laboratory science in a deliberately skeptical way: as an anthropological approach to the culture of the scientist. Drawing on recent work in literary criticism,
Comparing the Sciences: Citation Context Analysis of Papers from Neuropharmacology and the Sociology of Science
Classical analyses of differences among the sciences have measured social but not cognitive structure. This paper suggests a method for describing differences among fields in the processes of
Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.
The social structure and output of scholars at the University of Illinois are examined in terms of the characteristics of their academic subject matter. On the basis of an earlier multidimensional
Graphs in Scientific Publications
Abstract Graphical communication in scientific publications can be improved; a detailed analysis of all graphs in one volume of Science revealed that 30% had errors. Graphs are used more in some
Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science
Preface Introduction: challenges to the classical view of science 1. An outline of contructivism 2. Identity and discipline 3. The place of production 4. Speaking for nature 5. Interventions and
Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields
The editorial policies and practices of leading journals in four scientific fields are compared to determine differences related to stages of paradigm development. Hypotheses are developed and test...
Are Retrenchment Decisions Rational? The Role of Information in Times of Budgetary Stress.
In recent years, slow economic growth, recession, and a cutback in public spending have forced organizations to contract. Like many others, educational organizations have also experienced decline