Scientific Evidence and Equal Protection of the Law

@inproceedings{Ancheta2006ScientificEA,
  title={Scientific Evidence and Equal Protection of the Law},
  author={Angelo N. Ancheta},
  year={2006}
}
"Ancheta takes on a profoundly challenging topic of fundamental importance-the interaction of law and social science in the context of controversies over equality-and crafts an elegant presentation that can be appreciated on multiple levels. It is accessible to non-lawyers, but at the same time rich in sophisticated insights for scholars at the frontier. He builds a bridge between intellectual cultures, helping scientists understand how their work is understood and used (or not) by the law, and… 

Civil Rights, Education Research, and the Courts

This commentary was designed to accompany a series of articles in Educational Researcher, vol. 35, no. 1, a theme issue entitled “Moving Beyond Gratz and Grutter—The Next Generation of Research.” The

Bridging Divides: Understanding Knowledge Producers’ Perspectives on the Use of Research in Law

ABSTRACT Legal challenges continue to play central roles in critical higher education policy discussions. There are, however, wide gaps in understanding between the legal and research communities

Shaping Educational Policy Through the Courts: The Use of Social Science Research in Amicus Briefs in Fisher I

Different from more traditional policy-making avenues, the courts provide an antipolitical arena that does not require broad agreement from various constituents for policy enactment. Seeking to guide

Social Science Research and the Courts

During its 2013-2014 term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of Proposal 2, a ballot measure that amended Michigan’s state constitution to ban the consideration of race in

Adequacy, inequality, and cash for grades

Some political philosophers have recently argued that providing K–12 students with an adequate education suffices for social justice in education provided that the threshold of educational adequacy

Assessing the Uniformity in Australian Animal Protection Law: A Statutory Comparison

A state-by-state comparison of animal protection statutes based on key provisions showed that animal protection laws are generally consistent between each Australian jurisdiction and were found to have similar shortcomings, notably including lack of a consistent definition of ‘animal’ and reliance on forms of legal punishment which have questionable effectiveness.

Editors’ Introduction

In the Inaugural Editorial that appeared in the January–February 2013 issue of ER, we underscored our belief that high-quality research is fundamental to the improvement of policy as well as

ADLİ BİLİŞİMDE ÖNCELİKLENDİRME (TRİYAJ) YÖNTEMİNİN CEZA MUHAKEMESİ HUKUKU AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Onceliklendirme yontemi, veri saklama araclarinda ve veri saklama kapasitelerindeki artis karsisinda, sayisal delile sinirli zamanda ulasabilmek amaciyla uygulanan bir yontemdir. Temel olarak iki