Science in the web age: Start your engines

@article{Giles2005ScienceIT,
  title={Science in the web age: Start your engines},
  author={Jim Giles},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2005},
  volume={438},
  pages={554-555}
}
  • J. Giles
  • Published 30 November 2005
  • Medicine, Engineering
  • Nature
Google has launched another challenge to commercial search services — this time aimed at scientists. But is the new engine running as smoothly as its fans hope? Jim Giles investigates. 

Topics from this paper

Science in the web age: The real death of print
Despite clashes with publishers over copyright, Google's plan to make millions of books available online is turning the tide for efforts to digitize the world's literature. Andreas von Bubnoff tracks
Studying Journal Coverage in Google Scholar
TLDR
There is a relatively large gap in Google Scholar's coverage of German literature as well as weaknesses in the accessibility of Open Access content.
An exploratory study of Google Scholar
TLDR
The study shows deficiencies in the coverage and up‐to‐dateness of the GS index and points out which web servers are the most important data providers for this search service and which information sources are highly represented.
Search Engines for Tomorrow's Scholars
TLDR
This two-part column will explore scholars’ information activities, review how well scholarly search interfaces support these needs, and highlight these tools’ promising features.
Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?
TLDR
Evidence is found that Google Scholar ranks those documents whose language (or geographical web domain) matches with the user’s interface language higher than could be expected based on citations, however, this language effect and other factors related to the Google Scholar operation only have an incidental impact.
Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
This paper compares the h-indices of a list of highly-cited Israeli researchers based on citations counts retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively. In several case
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in
Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
  • Mary Shultz
  • Computer Science, Medicine
    Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
  • 2007
TLDR
This paper compares and contrasts a variety of test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar to gain a better understanding of Google Scholar's searching capabilities.
Can we use Google Scholar to identify the highly-cited documents?1
The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly-cited documents through Google Scholar is feasible and reliable. To this end, we carried out a
Ranking Marketing Journals Using the Search Engine Google Scholar
TLDR
This study provides an up-to-date ranking of 69 pure marketing journals based on actual cites of articles published between 2003 and 2007 and investigates the relationships between the hg-index, the journal impact factor, the index of familiarity and rank, the number of articles that a journal publishes, and the journal's age.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
D-Lib Magazine: Publishing as the Honest Broker
TLDR
The importance of persistent, location-independent identifiers (or names) is discussed primarily from the perspectives of information organization and the associated issues in cataloging resources in the MARC environment.
Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.
TLDR
A thermostable DNA polymerase was used in an in vitro DNA amplification procedure, the polymerase chain reaction, which significantly improves the specificity, yield, sensitivity, and length of products that can be amplified.