Science and politics: Dangerous liaisons

@article{Sesardi1992ScienceAP,
  title={Science and politics: Dangerous liaisons},
  author={Neven Sesardi{\'c}},
  journal={Journal for General Philosophy of Science},
  year={1992},
  volume={23},
  pages={129-151}
}
  • N. Sesardić
  • Published 1 March 1992
  • Philosophy
  • Journal for General Philosophy of Science
SummaryIn contrast to the opinion of numerous authors (e.g. R. Rudner, P. Kitcher, L. R. Graham, M. Dummett, N. Chomsky, R. Lewontin, etc.) it is argued here that the formation of opinion in science should be greatly insulated from political considerations. Special attention is devoted to the view that methodological standards for evaluation of scientific theories ought to vary according to the envisaged political uses of these theories. 

Fact–Value Conflation and the Study of Intelligence

Some prominent scientists and philosophers have stated openly that moral and political considerations should influence whether we accept or promulgate scientific theories. This widespread view has

Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”

Some prominent scientists and philosophers have stated openly that moral and political considerations should influence whether we accept or promulgate scientific theories. This widespread view has

Research on group differences in intelligence: A defense of free inquiry

ABSTRACT In a very short time, it is likely that we will identify many of the genetic variants underlying individual differences in intelligence. We should be prepared for the possibility that these

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES

Biology and Ideology: The Interpenetration of Science and Values

The mutual influence of science and values in biology is exhibited in several cases from the biological literature. It is argued in a number of cases, from R. A. Fisher's argument for the optimality

Moral Autonomy and the Rationality of Science

The few extant arguments concerning the autonomy of science in the rational acceptance of hypotheses are examined. It is concluded that science is not morally autonomous, and that the attendant

The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments

The question of the relationship of the making of value judgments in a typically ethical sense to the methods and procedures of science has been discussed in the literature at least to that point

Storm over biology : essays on science, sentiment, and public policy

This book had its genesis in Dr. Davis' remarkable editorial in the "New England Journal of Medicine" that sharply criticized medical schools for lowering their standards of admission to fill

The dynamics of technical controversy

The science and politics of I.Q.

TLDR
The present work arrives at two conclusions, one based on a detailed examination of the empirical evidence which has been adduced in support of the idea of heritability, and the other related to the second major conclusion of this work.

The Mismeasure of Man

TLDR
In this edition Dr. Gould has written a substantial new introduction telling how and why he wrote the book and tracing the subsequent history of the controversy on innateness right through The Bell Curve.

Science and the Social Order

The author, seeing science as a social activity, directs our attention to the problems of the social control of science. He discusses the sense in which science as a social activity is planned and

Between Science and Values

TLDR
Reading is a need and a hobby at once and this condition is the on that will make you feel that you must read.

Pascal's Wager

A. Pascal's statement of his wager argument is couched in terms of the theory of probability and the theory of games, and the exposition is unclear and unnecessarily complicated. The following is a