Science Rather Than God: Riccioli's Review of the Case for and against the Copernican Hypothesis

@article{Graney2012ScienceRT,
  title={Science Rather Than God: Riccioli's Review of the Case for and against the Copernican Hypothesis},
  author={Christopher M. Graney},
  journal={Journal for the History of Astronomy},
  year={2012},
  volume={43},
  pages={215 - 225}
}
  • C. Graney
  • Published 1 May 2012
  • Physics
  • Journal for the History of Astronomy
... [he was] an enemy to the Copernican system, and has the discredit of having measured the evidence for and against that system, not by the weight but by the number of the arguments.... '. . . Riccioli put forward a series of arguments in contradiction of the Earth's movement . . . marvellously absurd. "Would the birds . . . dare to rise in the air if they saw the earth passing away from beneath them?" From such a specimen we may judge of the rest of the egregious structure. . .. 2… 

Figures from this paper

The Work of the Best and Greatest Artist: A Forgotten Story of Religion, Science, and Stars in the Copernican Revolution

IN 1576 THE ENGLISH ASTRONOMER Thomas Digges (1546-95) published his English translation of Nicholaus Copernicus's (1473-1543) De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium together with a sketch of the

Francesco Ingoli's essay to Galileo: Tycho Brahe and science in the Inquisition's condemnation of the Copernican theory

In January of 1616, the month before before the Roman Inquisition would infamously condemn the Copernican theory as being "foolish and absurd in philosophy", Monsignor Francesco Ingoli addressed

The World-System of Giovanni Battista Riccioli and the Phases of Venus and Mercury

The article will look at some general lines of Riccioli’s system, to understand how an astronomer of the XVII century really worked and to understand which problems the Copernican system could not resolve.

Regarding how Tycho Brahe noted the absurdity of the Copernican Theory regarding the Bigness of Stars, while the Copernicans appealed to God to answer that absurdity

Tycho Brahe, the most prominent and accomplished astronomer of his era, made measurements of the apparent sizes of the Sun, Moon, stars, and planets. From these he showed that within a geocentric

Stars as the Armies of God: Lansbergen's Incorporation of Tycho Brahe's Star-Size Argument into the Copernican Theory

How did a Copernican deal with the 'star size' objection to the Copernican theory articulated by Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)? According to Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598-1671), a Copernican did so by

Doubting, Testing, and Confirming Galileo: A translation of Giovanni Battista Riccioli's experiments regarding the motion of a falling body, as reported in his 1651 Almagestum Novum

The Italian astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli is commonly credited with performing the first precise experiments to determine the acceleration of a freely falling body. Riccioli has been

Finding our Place in the Solar System

Finding Our Place in the Solar System gives a detailed account of how the Earth was displaced from its traditional position at the center of the universe to be recognized as one of several planets

Beyond Galileo: A translation of Giovanni Battista Riccioli's experiments regarding falling bodies and "air drag", as reported in his 1651 Almagestum Novum

The Italian astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli is commonly credited with performing the first precise experiments to determine the acceleration of a freely falling body, but he also went further,

The Specola Vaticana: Astronomy at the Vatican

The Vatican is an independent nation, with its own national astronomical observatory, the Specola Vaticana (Vatican Observatory). Astronomy has been supported at the Vatican since the 1582 reform of

Anatomy of a fall: Giovanni Battista Riccioli and the story of g

A centuries-old Latin text suggests that Earth’s gravitational pull was first measured not by Galileo but by a little-known Italian astronomer and priest.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES

Tycho Brahe's Critique of Copernicus and the Copernican System

For Luther he was the "fool who wanted to turn the art of astronomy on its head"'; for Frangois Viete he was the paraphraser of Ptolemy and "more a master of the dice than of the (mathematical)

A Non-Astronomical Image in an Astronomical Text: Visualizing Motion in Riccioli's Almagestum Novum

Giovanni Battista Riccioli’s compendium of mid-seventeenth century European astronomy, his Almagestum novum of 1651, is replete with astronomical diagrams and figures. In the middle of the second

The Telescope against Copernicus: Star Observations by Riccioli Supporting a Geocentric Universe

Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598–1671), in his Almagestum novum of 1651, reports on observations of the telescopic disks of stars made by him and his team. The Almagestum novum features a table of

Contra Galileo: Riccioli’s “Coriolis-Force” Argument on the Earth’s Diurnal Rotation

In 1651 the Italian astronomer and physicist Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598–1671) published his encyclopedic book, Almagestum novum, in which he presented seventy-seven arguments against the

Discoveries and opinions of Galileo

On SunspotsDialogue Concerning the Two Chief World SystemsIntroductions and Pocket Reading Guides to Discoveries and Opinions of GalileoThe Controversy on the Comets of 1618GalileoFrom X-rays to

From Eudoxus to Einstein: A History of Mathematical Astronomy

Preface 1. Introduction 2. Spheres and circles 3. The Ptolemaic universe 4. Developments in geocentric astronomy 5. The heliocentric universe 6. Tycho Brahe, Kepler and the ellipse 7. Galileo, the

Galileo, telescopic astronomy, and the Copernican system.

Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687.Edward Grant