Corpus ID: 237592577

Scholarly outputs of EU Research Funding Programs: Understanding differences between datasets of publications reported by grant holders and OpenAIRE Research Graph in H2020

@article{Mugabushaka2021ScholarlyOO,
  title={Scholarly outputs of EU Research Funding Programs: Understanding differences between datasets of publications reported by grant holders and OpenAIRE Research Graph in H2020},
  author={Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka and Miriam Baglioni and Alessia Bardi and Paolo Manghi},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2021},
  volume={abs/2109.10638}
}
Linking research results to grants is an essential prerequisite for an effective monitoring and evaluation of funding programs. For the EU research funding programs, there are multiple datasets linking scholarly publications to the individual grants, including both open data and those from commercial bibliometric databases. In this paper, we systematically compare openly available data from two data sources: on one hand those reported by the Grant holders (and subsequently published by the… Expand

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Linking Publications to Funding at Project Level: A curated dataset of publications reported by FP7 projects
TLDR
This dataset is, to the authors' knowledge, the first comprehensive and curated dataset of scholarly outputs of the Framework Programme and could only be created thanks to significant improvements and investments made in the reporting systems used by EU funded projects. Expand
Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata
TLDR
The kind of metadata that Crossref provides and how it is collected and curated are described and plans that will improve metadata quality and retrieval in the future are described. Expand
Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
TLDR
The trustworthiness of Scopus has led to its use as bibliometric data source for large-scale analyses in research assessments, research landscape studies, science policy evaluations, and university rankings. Expand
Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity
TLDR
Web of Science (WoS) is the world’s oldest, most widely used and authoritative database of research publications and citations and continues to work closely with bibliometric groups around the world to the benefit of both the community and the services the company provides to researchers and analysts. Expand
Bibliometric evaluation of the FP-5 and FP-6 results in the Czech Republic
TLDR
The most striking finding is the marked influence of FP on research direction, because after the project start, the participating teams published papers in ten new fields in which they did not publish before the project. Expand
Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data
TLDR
The approach that Digital Science is taking to support the scientometric community, together with the various Dimensions tools available to researchers who wish to use Dimensions data in their research at no cost are described. Expand
Tagging Funding Agencies and Grants in Scientific Articles using Sequential Learning Models
In this paper we present a solution for tagging funding bodies and grants in scientific articles using a combination of trained sequential learning models, namely conditional random fields (CRF),Expand
What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance
The European Union's (EU's) Framework Programmes of Research and Technological Development are subject to increasingly systematic evaluation. This paper reviews available evalua-tion evidence fromExpand
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
TLDR
A large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic highlights the importance of combining a comprehensive coverage of the scientific literature with a flexible set of filters for making selections of the literature. Expand
...
1
2
...