Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts

@inproceedings{Benoit2011ScalingPP,
  title={Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts},
  author={Kenneth Benoit},
  year={2011}
}
Scholars estimating policy positions from political texts typically code words or sentences and then build left-right policy scales based on the relative frequencies of text units coded into different categories. Here we reexamine such scales and propose a theoretically and linguistically superior alternative based on the logarithm of oddsratios. We contrast this scale with the current approach of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), showing that our proposed logit scale avoids widely… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 37 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
28 Citations
66 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 66 references

Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998

  • Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Eric Tanenbaum.
  • Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2001
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

  • A. Agresti
  • New York: Wiley.
  • 1996
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates.

  • D. Firth
  • Biometrika 80
  • 1993
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Confrontation Still? Examining Parties’ Policy Positions in Greece.

  • K. Gemenis, E. Dinas
  • Comparative European Politics
  • 2010
1 Excerpt

After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament.

  • S. Hix, A. Noury
  • Legislative Studies Quarterly
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

Agenda Control, Majority Party Power, and the House Committee on Rules, 1937–52.

  • E. Schickler, K. Pearson
  • Legislative Studies Quarterly
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

Comparing Cosponsorship and Roll-Call Ideal Points.

  • E. Alemán, E. Calvo, M. P. Jones, N. Kaplan
  • Legislative Studies Quarterly
  • 2009
1 Excerpt

Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of Difference and Monte Carlo Tests.

  • Carroll, Royce, Jeffrey B. Lewis, James Lo, Keith T. Poole, Howard Rosenthal
  • Legislative Studies Quarterly
  • 2009
2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…