Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions

@article{Artinger2022SatisficingIT,
  title={Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions},
  author={Florian M. Artinger and Gerd Gigerenzer and Perke Jacobs},
  journal={Journal of Economic Literature},
  year={2022}
}
In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: an agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty… 
3 Citations
Studies in Ecological Rationality
TLDR
It is illustrated that a successful theory of rationality will focus on the adaptive aspects of the mind and will need to account for three components: the mind's information processing, the environment to which the mind adapts, and the intersection between the environment and the mind.
Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing
How Do Taxi Drivers Terminate Their Shifts when Earnings Are Hard To Predict?
A fundamental assumption of expected utility models is that agents make predictions by formulating rational expectations. Building on this assumption, the literature has addressed to what extent

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 147 REFERENCES
When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation
This paper is about satisficing behaviour. Rather tautologically, this is when decision-makers are satisfied with achieving some objective, rather than in obtaining the best outcome. The term was
Optimize, satisfice, or choose without deliberation? A simple minimax-regret assessment
TLDR
This paper interprets satisficing as a class of decision strategies that a person might use when seeking to optimize in a setting where deliberation is costly, studying decision making as a problem of minimax-regret planning in which costly deliberation enables a person to reduce ambiguity.
Revealed preference and satisficing behavior
TLDR
This paper will show how to derive semi-orders (and so-called interval orders) based on the idea that agents are utility satisficers rather than utility optimizers, and two standard assumptions of rationality will be given up.
Bounded-Rationality Models: Tasks to Become Intellectually Competitive
Research in experimental economics has cogently challenged the fundamental precept of neoclassical economics that economic agents optimize. The last two decades have seen elaboration of boundedly
Search and Satisficing
Many everyday decisions are made without full examination of all available options, and, as a result, the best available option may be missed. We develop a search-theoretic choice experiment to study
Incorporating Limited Rationality into Economics
Harstad and Selten (this forum) raise interesting questions about the relative promise of optimization models and bounded-rationality models in making progress in economics. This article builds from
Satisficing Measures for Analysis of Risky Positions
TLDR
A class of measures for evaluating the quality of financial positions based on their ability to achieve desired financial goals is introduced and it is shown that they are dual to classes of risk measures.
Boundedly rational expected utility theory
TLDR
A satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a boundedly rational deliberation process and produces patterns of behaviour that violate standard EUT axioms, while at the same time capturing systematic relationships between choice probabilities, response times and confidence judgments.
...
...