Sampling and thematic analysis: a response to Fugard and Potts

@article{Hammersley2015SamplingAT,
  title={Sampling and thematic analysis: a response to Fugard and Potts},
  author={M. Hammersley},
  journal={International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
  year={2015},
  volume={18},
  pages={687 - 688}
}
  • M. Hammersley
  • Published 2015
  • Psychology
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • Fugard and Potts’ paper focuses on an issue that is often of concern for qualitative researchers: how many informants to interview, and/or how many settings to observe. However, I think their approach to this issue is misconceived, and could have damaging consequences. How many cases to study is a question that requires some consideration at the start of the research process, but qualitative researchers do not usually have to make a final decision about this at that point: they can restructure… CONTINUE READING
    29 Citations
    Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori?
    • 69
    • PDF
    Confounding issues related to determining sample size in qualitative research
    • 14
    • Highly Influenced
    Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation
    • 295