Salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.

@article{Tsujimura2006SalvageMT,
  title={Salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.},
  author={A. Tsujimura and Y. Miyagawa and T. Takao and S. Takada and M. Koga and M. Takeyama and K. Matsumiya and H. Fujioka and A. Okuyama},
  journal={The Journal of urology},
  year={2006},
  volume={175 4},
  pages={
          1446-9; discussion 1449
        }
}
  • A. Tsujimura, Y. Miyagawa, +6 authors A. Okuyama
  • Published 2006
  • Medicine
  • The Journal of urology
  • PURPOSE TESE is considered the best procedure for identifying a tubule for spermatozoa retrieval. This technique improves the SRR to around 50%. However, it has been unclear whether it is useful in patients in whom conventional TESE has failed. We compared the outcome of microdissection TESE in patients in whom conventional TESE failed to that in patients who did not undergo conventional TESE. We also evaluated relations between the outcome of salvage microdissection TESE and the… CONTINUE READING
    51 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Clinical Comparison of Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction and Microdissection Techniques for Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
    • 45
    • PDF
    Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update.
    • 115
    • PDF
    Analysis of factors affecting repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes in infertile men.
    • 2
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed mTESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Long-term experience at a single institute.
    • 3
    • PDF
    Sperm retrieval techniques
    • 46

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
    Microdissection TESE: sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.
    • 82
    • PDF