Sadness and Susceptibility to Judgmental Bias: The Case of Anchoring

@article{Bodenhausen2000SadnessAS,
  title={Sadness and Susceptibility to Judgmental Bias: The Case of Anchoring},
  author={Galen V. Bodenhausen and Shira Gabriel and M R Lineberger},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2000},
  volume={11},
  pages={320 - 323}
}
In a wide range of empirical paradigms, sadness has been associated with more extensive and detail-oriented thinking than happiness, resulting in reductions in judgmental bias that arise from reliance on stereotypes and other simple decision heuristics. It was hypothesized that anchoring would constitute a significant exception to this general pattern. Recent research on anchoring indicates that an active thought process underlies the emergence of this bias. If sad people are likely to think… 

Oxford Companion to the Affective Sciences

A cognitive bias is any systematic deviation from a normative criterion that affects thinking, often leading to errors in judgment. Affect, in particular, may bias cognition, both by altering the

Self-Generated Anchors Angry ( or Disgusted ) , but Adjusting ? The Effect of Specific Emotions on Adjustment From

Many numerical judgments are made by adjusting from a salient anchor value. This research examines the effect of high-certainty emotions—emotions associated with feelings of confidence about what is

The De‐biasing Effect of Incidental Anger on Other‐provided Anchors

The current research investigates the effect of incidental anger on anchoring bias. We hypothesized that feeling angry will make people less influenced by other-provided anchors because of the moving

Motivated to confront: How experiencing anger affects anchoring bias

Prior research has asserted that emotions affect anchoring bias in decision making through the emotion’s certainty appraisal (Inbar & Gilovich, 2011) or through the emotion’s action tendencies (Jung

Angry (or Disgusted), but Adjusting? The Effect of Specific Emotions on Adjustment From Self-Generated Anchors

Many numerical judgments are made by adjusting from a salient anchor value. This research examines the effect of high-certainty emotions—emotions associated with feelings of confidence about what is

Tilburg University Angry ( or disgusted ) , but adjusting ? The effect of specific emotions on adjustment from self-generated

Many numerical judgments are made by adjusting from a salient anchor value. This research examines the effect of high-certainty emotions—emotions associated with feelings of confidence about what is

Effects of dysphoria and induced negative mood on the processes underlying hindsight bias

Dysphoria, but not induced negative mood, was associated with a stronger reconstruction bias, compared with neutral mood, and a recollection bias appeared in neutral, but neither in induced negative nor dysphoric mood.

Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring

Anchoring effects, the assimilation of numerical estimates to previously considered standards, are highly robust. Two studies examined whether mood and expertise jointly moderate the magnitude of

Numerical Judgments and Recall by Consumers: Selective Accessibility under Prevention and Promotion Motivations

Prior research suggests that people’s numerical estimates are often excessively influenced by an arbitrary anchor given during earlier comparative judgments (“anchoring bias”). In the current

How sadness and happiness influence ethnic stereotyping

Incidental affective states tend to influence stereotyping in counterintuitive way: experimentally induced happiness leads to more stereotyping while experimentally induced sadness leads to less
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

Mood and Stereotyping: Affective States and the Use of General Knowledge Structures

We review how affective states moderate the impact of stereotypes in social judgment. The reported evidence suggests that stereotypes have more impact on judgments formed by individuals in a happy

Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment.

Four experiments examined the effects of happiness on the tendency to use stereotypes in social judgment. In each experiment, individuals who had been induced to feel happy rendered more stereotypic

Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception.

Experiments 3, 4, and 5 showed that the experience of these emotions, rather than their cognitive constituents, mediates these effects of sadness and anger on social judgment.

All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making.

  • RaghunathanPham
  • Psychology
    Organizational behavior and human decision processes
  • 1999
Results from three experiments show that, in gambling decisions, as well as in job-selection decisions, sad individuals are biased in favor of high-risk/high-reward options, whereas anxious individuals are bias in Favor of low- risk/low-reWARD options.

Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness

The overwhelming majority of research on affect and social information processing has focused on the judgments and memories of people in good or bad moods rather than examining more specific kinds of

Depressive Diligence in Social Information Processing: Implications for Order Effects in Impressions and for Social Memory

Recent theorizing suggests that mild to moderate depressives often adopt an accuracy goal in thinking about others, causing them to exhibit heightened diligence in social information processing. Two

Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.

  • ChapmanJohnson
  • Psychology
    Organizational behavior and human decision processes
  • 1999
This work suggests that anchors affect judgments by increasing the availability and construction of features that the anchor and target hold in common and reducing the availability of features of the target that differ from the anchor.

Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring

Judgmental anchoring constitutes an ubiquitous and robust phenomenon. Nevertheless, its underlying mechanisms remain somewhat mysterious. We discuss four accounts that attempt to explain anchoring

Mood and the use of scripts: does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?

A pattern of findings indicates higher reliance on general knowledge structures under happy rather than sad moods, incompatible with the assumption that happy moods decrease either cognitive capacity or processing motivation in general, which would predict impaired secondary-task performance.

Depression and the impression-formation continuum: piecemeal processing despite the availability of category information.

A study explored depressed-nondepressed differences in impression formation and showed depressed Ss were shown to use trait attributes in evaluating a person, even when induced to categorize the individual.