Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial

@inproceedings{Detollenaere2015SacrospinousHV,
  title={Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial},
  author={Ren{\'e}e J. Detollenaere and Jan den Boon and Jelle Stekelenburg and Joanna Inthout and Mark Ewout Vierhout and Kirsten Birgit Kluivers and Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven},
  booktitle={BMJ},
  year={2015}
}
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether uterus preserving vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse. DESIGN Multicentre randomised controlled non-blinded non-inferiority trial. SETTING 4 non-university teaching hospitals, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 208 healthy women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher requiring surgery and no history of pelvic floor surgery… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 22 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS