STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

@inproceedings{Cohen2016STARD2G,
  title={STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration},
  author={J{\'e}r{\'e}mie F Cohen and Dani{\"e}l Arnoldus Korevaar and Douglas G. Altman and David E Bruns and Constantine Gatsonis and Lotty Hooft and Les M. Irwig and Deborah Levine and J. Reitsma and Henrica C W de Vet and Patrick M. M. Bossuyt},
  booktitle={BMJ open},
  year={2016}
}
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the… CONTINUE READING

Figures and Tables from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 82 CITATIONS

A critical appraisal of biomarkers in prostate cancer

  • World Journal of Urology
  • 2019
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Diagnostic Accuracy in Fit-for-Purpose PD-L1 Testing.

  • Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM
  • 2019
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS, BACKGROUND & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

An automatic diagnostic system based on deep learning, to diagnose hyperlipidemia

  • Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy
  • 2019
VIEW 1 EXCERPT
CITES METHODS

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2017
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 5 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 33 Citations per year over the last 3 years

  • 45% Increase in citations per year in 2018 over 2017

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 117 REFERENCES

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…