STANDARD QUALITY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPERS FROM A VARIETY OF FIELDS Prepared

@inproceedings{Kmet2004STANDARDQA,
  title={STANDARD QUALITY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPERS FROM A VARIETY OF FIELDS Prepared},
  author={Marko Kmet and Robert C. Lee and Linda Sue Cook},
  year={2004}
}
This paper has been prepared on the basis of available information of which the Foundation is aware from public literature and expert opinion and attempts to be current to the date of publication. Additional information and comments relative to the information paper are welcome and should be sent to: Acknowledgements The Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research is grateful to the following persons for information and comments on the draft paper. The views expressed in the final paper… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 39 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 246 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 references

Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement • 1999
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Mutations of BRCA genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR • 2002

Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews

K. S. Khan, G. ter Riet, J. Glanville, A. J. Sowden, J. Kleijnen
CRD Report Number 4, • 2001

Evidence-based medicine : how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed

DL Sackett
2000

Qualitative methods in qualitative health research

C Pope, N. Mays
Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books, • 2000

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…