SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula.
@inproceedings{Mclaughlin1969SMOGG,
title={SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula.},
author={G. Mclaughlin},
year={1969}
}in a recent issue of this journal, Fry (4) described "a readability formula that saves time." The panel immediately below gives a method of assessing readability which is even quicker and so simple that one statistician who glanced at an earlier version of this paper thought that it was a "put on," a fake. Although this system, SMOG Grading, is laughably simple, it is in fact more valid than previous readability formulas. The rest of this paper is devoted to substantiating that claim.
Topics from this paper.
1,616 Citations
Identifying Textual Features of High-Quality Questions: An Empirical Study on Stack Overflow
- Computer Science
- 2017
Comparative Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Resources on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Medicine
- 2017
Highly Influenced
Open Access
References
Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
" A Readability Formula That Saves Time , " Journal of Reading , 11 ,
- 1968
A Readability Formula That Saves Time,
- 1968
Chall . " A Formula for Predicting Readability
- 1948
Developing and Measuring Flexibility in Reading,
- 1963
Harry . " Proposals for British Readability Measures , " in John Downing and
Proposals for British Readability Measures,
- 1968