SELF‐ VERSUS OTHERS' RATINGS AS PREDICTORS OF ASSESSMENT CENTER RATINGS: VALIDATION EVIDENCE FOR 360‐DEGREE FEEDBACK PROGRAMS

@inproceedings{Atkins2002SELFVO,
  title={SELF‐ VERSUS OTHERS' RATINGS AS PREDICTORS OF ASSESSMENT CENTER RATINGS: VALIDATION EVIDENCE FOR 360‐DEGREE FEEDBACK PROGRAMS},
  author={Paul W. B. Atkins and Robert Eri Wood},
  year={2002}
}
Although 360-degree feedback programs are rapidly increasing in popularity, few studies have examined how well ratings from these programs predict an independent criterion. This study had 2 main aims: First, to examine the validity of ratings from a 360-degree feedback program using assessment center ratings as an independent criterion and to determine which source (i.e., self, supervisor, peers, or subordinates) provided the most valid predictor of the criterion measure of competency. Second… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 73 CITATIONS

Participant Self-Assessment of Development Center Performance

VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2003
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 8 Highly Influenced Citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…