SAR versus S(inc): What is the appropriate RF exposure metric in the range 1-10 GHz? Part I: Using planar body models.

Abstract

This is the first of two articles addressing the most appropriate crossover frequency at which incident power flux density (S(inc)) replaces the spatial peak value of the specific energy absorption rate (SAR) averaged over 1 or 10 g (i.e., peak 1 or 10 g SAR) as the basic restriction for protecting against radiofrequency (RF) heating effects in the 1-10 GHz… (More)
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20578

Topics

  • Presentations referencing similar topics