SAGO has a politics problem, and WHO is ignoring it

  title={SAGO has a politics problem, and WHO is ignoring it},
  author={Joshua R. Moon and Clare Wenham and Sophie Harman},
The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Scientific Advisory Group on the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO) has recently been established to “define and guide studies into the origins [of Novel Pathogens]” and “advise WHO on prioritising studies and field investigations into [Novel Pathogens].” In both of these, an attention to political questions like “which pathogens deserve investigation?” and “how should countries’ possible pathogen origins be prioritised?” will need to be addressed. 



Sitting on the boundary: the role of reports in investigations into alleged biological-weapons use

ABSTRACT Concerns that biological weapons will be used has focused attention on the need to develop a capability to independently investigate any allegation of use. The United Nations

Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems

It is shown that mammal species that harbour more pathogens overall are more likely to occur in human-managed ecosystems, suggesting that these trends may be mediated by ecological or life-history traits that influence both host status and tolerance to human disturbance.

Principal-agent problems in international organizations

The paper provides a framework for analysing control problems in international organisations and reviews the disparate evidence from a public-choice perspective. Most examples concern the European

Structural drivers of vulnerability to zoonotic disease in Africa

It is argued that addressing the underlying structural drivers of disease vulnerability is essential for a ‘One Health’ approach to tackling zoonotic diseases in Africa, and economic and political dimensions are ultimately critical and One Health approaches must engage with these factors.

Why gain of function research matters

  • The Conversation
  • 2021