• DOI:10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104
• Corpus ID: 156061334

Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: implications for conflict resolution

@article{Gerrits2016RussianPO,
  title={Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: implications for conflict resolution},
  author={Andr{\'e} W. M. Gerrits and Max Bader},
  journal={East European Politics},
  year={2016},
  volume={32},
  pages={297 - 313}
}

• A. Gerrits, M. Bader
• Published 2 July 2016
• Political Science
• East European Politics

ABSTRACT This article applies the concepts of linkage and leverage as developed by Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way and elaborated by Gwendolyn Sasse in the introduction to this special issue of East European Politics to Russia’s involvement with Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the two quasi-independent states in the South Caucasus. Through this re-conceptualisation of the developments in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, combined with new empirical insights, the article aims to increase our understanding of the conflicts in the region, of the involvement of the Russian Federation in particular, and consequently of the prospects of international conflict resolution. Compared to other political entities in the former Soviet Union, Abkhazia and South Ossetia represent an extreme case of Russian linkage and leverage. This article focuses on the period after the Russian–Georgian war in 2008, when Russia recognised the regions’ independence and effectively turned them into Russian protectorates. The economic, intergovernmental, technocratic and social linkages between Russia and the two regions are extraordinarily deep, and they directly undermine the autonomy of the regions. The post-war delegation of Russian cadres and institutional and legislative diffusion creates additional linkages underpinning Russian leverage.