• Corpus ID: 241372

Running head : HUMOR AND MORALITY 1 Why So Serious ? Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and a Sense of Humor are Psychologically Incompatible

@inproceedings{Yam2014RunningH,
  title={Running head : HUMOR AND MORALITY 1 Why So Serious ? Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and a Sense of Humor are Psychologically Incompatible},
  author={Kai Chi Yam},
  year={2014}
}
Many of the jokes people enjoy carry a certain degree of moral violation. Since displaying humor often requires committing benign moral violations, we hypothesize that 1) a moral mindset stifles humor and 2) morally-focused people are less humorous, and are therefore less liked by their workplace peers. Participants primed with a moral mindset were less likely to appreciate humor that involved benign moral violations (Study 1) and less likely to generate jokes others found funny (Study 2… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 92 REFERENCES
When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
Researchers in moral psychology and social justice have agreed that morality is about matters of harm, rights, and justice. On this definition of morality, conservative opposition to social justice
The influence of humor on desirability
Too Close for Comfort, or Too Far to Care? Finding Humor in Distant Tragedies and Close Mishaps
TLDR
Two factors that jointly influence perceptions of humor are examined: the degree to which a stimulus is a violation and one’s perceived distance from the stimulus; this benign-violation account suggests that distance facilitates humor in the case of tragedies by reducing threat, but that closeness facilitates humor during mishaps by maintaining some sense of threat.
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
TLDR
Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.
The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh
Humor, wit, and laughter surround each person. From everyday quips to the carefully contrived comedy of literature, newspapers, and television we experience humor in many forms, yet the impetus for
Good Without Knowing it: Subtle Contextual Cues can Activate Moral Identity and Reshape Moral Intuition
The role of moral intuition (i.e., a set of implicit processes which occur automatically and at the fringe of conscious awareness) has been increasingly implicated in business decisions and
Mapping the moral domain.
TLDR
The Moral Foundations Questionnaire is developed on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions and convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant.
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.
TLDR
Relationship regulation theory predicts that any action, including violence, unequal treatment, and "impure" acts, may be perceived as morally correct depending on the moral motive employed and how the relevant social relationship is construed.
The Humor Code: A Global Search for What Makes Things Funny
in generic qualities than political implications; I am just not sure that most readers will follow him in this preference. Likewise, Brodie’s argument that folklore studies is the best discipline
The Rise and Fall of Humor
Humor is a ubiquitous experience that facilitates coping, social coordination, and well-being. We examine how humorous responses to a tragedy change over time by measuring reactions to jokes about
...
...