Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis

Abstract

In an attempt to eliminate similar item content as an alternative explanation for the relation between depression and rumination, a secondary analysis was conducted using the data from S. Nolen-Hoeksema, J. Larson, and C. Grayson (1999). After constructing a measure of rumination unconfounded with depression content, support for a two factor model of rumination was found. These analyses indicate that the 2 components, reflective pondering and brooding, differentially relate to depression in terms of predictive ability and gender difference mediation. The results presented here support the general premise of Nolen-Hoeksema's Response Styles Theory (S. Nolen-Hoeksema 1987) that rumination can contribute to more depressive symptoms and to the gender difference in depression, but suggest important refinements of the theory. Such refinements include the need to differentiate between the reflective pondering component of rumination and the brooding component in rumination research.

DOI: 10.1023/A:1023910315561

5 Figures and Tables

0100200'04'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

1,594 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,594 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Treynor2004RuminationRA, title={Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis}, author={Wendy Treynor and Richard Gonzalez and Susan Nolen-Hoeksema}, journal={Cognitive Therapy and Research}, year={2004}, volume={27}, pages={247-259} }