Ruling Out or Ruling In Disease with the Most sensitiue or Specific Diagnostic Test

@article{Boyko1994RulingOO,
  title={Ruling Out or Ruling In Disease with the Most sensitiue or Specific Diagnostic Test},
  author={E. Boyko},
  journal={Medical Decision Making},
  year={1994},
  volume={14},
  pages={175 - 179}
}
  • E. Boyko
  • Published 1994
  • Medicine
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Previous publications have advocated that clinicians choose the most sensitive diagnostic test to rule out disease and the most specific diagnostic test to rule in disease. This paper critically examines the validity of these recommendations. First, the author finds that following these recommendations does not lead to the highest disease probability for a positive test result (thereby best ruling in disease) or the lowest disease probability for a negative test result (thereby best ruling out… CONTINUE READING
    104 Citations

    Tables and Topics from this paper.

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    Selecting diagnostic tests for ruling out or ruling in disease: the use of the Kullback-Leibler distance.
    • W. Lee
    • Medicine
    • International journal of epidemiology
    • 1999
    • 32
    • PDF
    Too Bad It Isn't True
    • J. Baron
    • Medicine
    • Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    • 1994
    • 6
    Incorporating Uncertainty Into Medical Decision Making: An Approach to Unexpected Test Results
    • M. Bianchi, B. Alexander, S. Cash
    • Computer Science, Medicine
    • Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    • 2009
    • 27
    • PDF
    A New Logistic Regression Approach for the Evaluation of Diagnostic Test Results
    • 36
    Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs.
    • 51

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES