Rooting for the top dog: How social dominance motives shape group preference in intergroup competition

@article{Does2016RootingFT,
  title={Rooting for the top dog: How social dominance motives shape group preference in intergroup competition},
  author={Serena Does and A. Mentovich},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year={2016},
  volume={62},
  pages={24-29}
}
Abstract Moving beyond prior research establishing people's preference for underdogs, we examined the role of social dominance orientation (SDO) in shaping individuals' preference for underdogs versus top dogs in intergroup competitions. Because a victorious underdog can be seen as a threat to hierarchy, we predicted that SDO would be negatively associated with underdog support. In the context of two real-world group competitions—i.e., the FIFA World Cup and the Olympic Games—we found that SDO… Expand
9 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification: The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations
  • 31
Implications of Research Staff Demographics for Psychological Science
  • 13
  • PDF

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
  • 3,634
  • PDF
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
  • 3,254
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Biased Evaluations of In-Group and Out-Group Spectator Behavior at Sporting Events: The Importance of Team Identification and Threats to Social Identity
  • 153
The Appeal of the Underdog
  • 100
  • Highly Influential
Rooting for (and Then Abandoning) the Underdog
  • 94
The attractive underdog
  • 14
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships.
  • 1,454
  • PDF
...
1
2
...