Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.

@article{Geller2012RoboticVA,
  title={Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.},
  author={Elizabeth Joanne Geller and Brent Ashley Parnell and Gena C. Dunivan},
  journal={Urology},
  year={2012},
  volume={79 3},
  pages={532-6}
}
OBJECTIVE To evaluate longer-term clinical outcomes after robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort assessment of women undergoing either robotic or abdominal sacrocolpopexy between March 2006 and October 2007. Pelvic floor support was measured using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination, and pelvic floor function was assessed via validated questionnaires, including the… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 extracted citations

A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics • 2016

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…