Ritual Abuse, Hot Air, and Missed Opportunities

  title={Ritual Abuse, Hot Air, and Missed Opportunities},
  author={Michael Crichton},
  pages={1461 - 1463}
  • M. Crichton
  • Published 5 March 1999
  • Political Science
  • Science
Scientists dislike negative portrayals of scientists and scientific research in the media. However, a closer examination reveals that these media images are inevitable and probably cannot be changed. Science should turn instead to practical steps to improve its image with the public. 
Chemists and their craft in fiction film
The paper presents results from a quantitative analysis of some 200 fiction films. Chemistry is the iconic discipline of the 'mad scientist' reflecting the alchemical imagery that was prevalent untilExpand
Portrayals of science and scientists, and ‘science for citizenship’
There are increasing calls in the science education community for ‘science for citizenship’ as an important goal for the school science curriculum of the 21st century. The potential influence ofExpand
Toward a Model of Scientists’ Public Communication Activity
This study aims to contribute to our empirical understanding of the factors and processes that lead scientists to engage in public communication. Using a national sample, this study identifies keyExpand
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists
It is argued that understanding the Frankenstein stigma can empower scientists by helping them revisit their own biases as well as responding effectively to people’s expectations for, and attitudes towards, scientists and scientific artifacts. Expand
Between magic and reason: science in 19th century popular fiction
The scientist in fiction is much maligned. The mad, bad scientist has framed much of the debate about literary representations of science and with good reason since he is a towering icon of popularExpand
Self-image, the long view and archaeological engagement with film: an animated case study
Abstract Academic engagement with popular constructions of archaeology in film is often in the style of analysing the self-image of archaeologists and archaeology. Two distinctive types of thisExpand
Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?
Analysis of the National Science Board's Science and Engineering Indicators Survey provides evidence that different media—newspapers, general television, science television, and science magazines—do affect perceptions differently, and a media effects model specific to public perceptions of science and technology is introduced. Expand
Engaging scientists in science communication: The effect of social proof and meaning
Abstract Science communication helps the general public understand science breakthroughs, making them support evidence-based decision making. Therefore, science communication is of paramountExpand
Socialization or Rewards? Predicting U.S. Scientist-Media Interactions
This study investigates scientists as public communicators, with a particular focus on factors that influence scientists' interactions with the mass media. Based on a U.S. survey of scientists, theExpand
How to Teach Biology Using the Movie Science of Cloning People, Resurrecting the Dead, and Combining Flies and Humans
While popular culture is generally acknowledged to have some impact on public opinion of science, attempts to evaluate this relationship have focused largely on how the public perceives science,Expand