Risks of meat: the relative impact of cognitive, affective and moral concerns

@article{Berndsen2005RisksOM,
  title={Risks of meat: the relative impact of cognitive, affective and moral concerns},
  author={Mari{\"e}tte Berndsen and Joop van der Pligt},
  journal={Appetite},
  year={2005},
  volume={44},
  pages={195-205}
}

Tables from this paper

Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice
In three studies we addressed the impact of perceived risk and negative affect on risky choice. In Study 1, we tested a model that included both perceived risk and negative affect as predictors of
Thinking versus feeling: Differentiating between cognitive and affective components of perceived cancer risk
TLDR
The validity of a measurement instrument differentiating cognitive and affective probability beliefs is investigated and whether behavioural decision making is mainly guided by cognition or affect is examined, providing support for the construct validity of the measures used to assess cognitive and Affective likelihood.
Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice
In three studies we addressed the impact of perceived risk and negative affect on risky choice. In Study 1, we tested a model that included both perceived risk and negative affect as predictors of
Influencing Feelings of Cancer Risk: Direct and Moderator Effects of Affectively Laden Phrases in Risk Communication
TLDR
It is suggested that solely using affective phrases in risk communication may not be sufficient to directly influence feelings of risk and other methods need to be explored in future research.
The discussion of meat and the relevance of cultural capital in that discussion.
The aim of the study is to gain insight in differences and similarities in the way people with high cultural capital (HCC) and low cultural capital (LCC) talk about the consumptionand reduction of
The influence of narrative risk communication on feelings of cancer risk.
TLDR
Sunbed users who were exposed to narrative risk information could better imagine themselves developing skin cancer and reported higher feelings of skin cancer risk at T1 and T2, providing support for the effects of narrative risk communication in influencing feelings of cancer risk through ease of imagination.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Ambivalence towards meat
Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: an examination of the role of ambivalence
TLDR
Regression analyses showed that, as predicted by the Theory of Planned Behaviour, attitudes, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of intention to follow each diet (apart from the vegetarian diet, where subjective norm was non-significant).
The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping.
The impact of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic arousal and altruistic responding was investigated in an American, working adult, ethnically diverse population. Altruistic
The Role of Moral Judgments Within Expectancy-Value-Based Attitude-Behavior Models
Rational choice models are characterized by the image of the self-interested Homo economicus. The role of moral concerns, which may involve a concern for others' welfare in people's judgments and
Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior.
In two studies we test the effects of anticipated affective reactions such as regret on behavioral expectations and behavior. These effects were examined in the context of sexual risk-taking
EXTENDING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR: THE ROLE OF PERSONAL NORM, INSTRUMENTAL BELIEFS AND AFFECTIVE BELIEFS IN PREDICTING DRIVING VIOLATIONS
This chapter summarises recent work by the Manchester Driver Behaviour Group. The authors begin by briefly outlining the research which indicates why it is important to understand the attitudes,
The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits
This paper re-examines the commonly observed inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. We propose that this relationship occurs because people rely on affect when judging the
Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes
The reasons why people do not always act in accord with their attitudes has been the focus of much social psychological research, as have the factors that account for why people change their
Fear, anger, and risk.
TLDR
The present studies highlight multiple benefits of studying specific emotions as a complement to studies that link affective valence to judgment outcomes, and predict that fear and anger have opposite effects on risk perception.
Influences on Meat Avoidance Among British Students
TLDR
Chicken and turkey were the least often avoided flesh foods among men and women, and the only clear gradation from flesh-eating to vegetarianism was eating poultry and either beef/lamb or pork, eating only poultry and eating neither.
...
...