Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries

@article{Gonzlez2004RiskOC,
  title={Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries},
  author={Amy Berrington de Gonz{\'a}lez and Sarah C. Darby},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={2004},
  volume={363},
  pages={345-351}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

The risk of cancer attributable to diagnostic medical radiation: Estimation for France in 2015
TLDR
The contribution of medical IR to the cancer burden is small, and the benefits largely outweigh its harms, however, some of these IR‐associated cancer cases may be preventable through dose optimization of and enhanced justification for diagnostic examinations.
Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries
TLDR
Estimates of risk of cancer after protracted low doses of ionising radiation after nuclear workers in the largest study of nuclear workers ever conducted are higher than, but statistically compatible with, the risk estimates used for current radiation protection standards.
Collective radiation dose from diagnostic x-ray examination in nine public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
TLDR
It is estimated that the adoption of rare earth screen technology might reduce the annual incidence of cancer which would be fatal after an average latency period of 18.4 years by half, hence this research recommended adopting rare earthScreen technology in Ethiopia.
Diagnostic radiation procedures and risk of prostate cancer
TLDR
Exposure of the prostate gland to diagnostic radiological procedures may be associated with increased cancer risk, and this effect seems to be modified by a positive family history of cancer suggesting that genetic factors may play a role in this risk association.
Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children.
TLDR
Pediatric CT scans in Israel may result in a small but not negligible increased lifetime risk for cancer mortality, and because of the uncertainty regarding radiation effects at low doses, estimates of CT-related cancer mortality should be considered with caution.
How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update
TLDR
This paper reviews current knowledge on cancer risks associated with diagnostic radiation and aims to help forensic experts, dentists, and pediatricians evaluate the risk from radiation when using X-rays in age-estimation procedures.
Radiation Exposure of Patients Undergoing Common Diagnostic X-Ray Examinations in Some Major Hospitals in Visakhapatnam, India
TLDR
Although the use of ionizing radiation for diagnostic medical procedures is an acceptable part of modern medicine, there is also the potential for inappropriate use and unnecessary radiation dose to the patient, so the request of high dose procedures must be justified.
Childhood cancer risk from conventional radiographic examinations for selected referral criteria: results from a large cohort study.
TLDR
Overall, there is no increase in cancer risk among children and youths with very low radiation doses from diagnostic radiation, which is compatible with model calculations.
Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe.
TLDR
Data analysis shows significant differences in national radiological practices and a very uneven distribution of patient doses amongst the world population, and projection radiography has succeeded in reducing dose consumption, computed tomography and radiological interventions have given rise to a significant growth of patient exposure.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
CANCER RISKS FROM MEDICAL RADIATION
  • E. Ron
  • Medicine
    Health physics
  • 2003
TLDR
Temporal trends indicate that worldwide population exposure from medical radiation is increasing, and patients treated with radium appear to have an elevated risk of bone sarcomas and possibly cancers of the breast, liver, kidney, thyroid, and bladder.
Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.
TLDR
It is suggested that pediatric CT will result in significantly increased lifetime radiation risk over adult CT, both because of the increased dose per milliampere-second, and the increased lifetime risk per unit dose.
Effective doses to members of the public from the diagnostic application of ionizing radiation in Germany
TLDR
Radiation risk must always be viewed in context with disease- and therapy-related risks and balanced against the benefit of the diagnostic examination, which should always exceed the risk for a well-indicated procedure.
Doses to Patients from Medical X-ray Examinations in the UK - 2000 Review
TLDR
Reference doses have been derived for a larger number of examinations on adults than previously and, for the first time, for three examinations on children, with specific values for five standard-sized patients corresponding to new born babies, 1, 5, 10 and 15 year olds.
Definition and estimation of lifetime detriment from radiation exposures: principles and methods.
TLDR
Differences between reported risk estimates include details of the calculations, the baseline rates and age distributions of the exposed population, the forms of the models for excess rates, handling of organ-specific doses, and the groupings of cancer sites.
Joint Effects of Radiation and Smoking on Lung Cancer Risk among Atomic Bomb Survivors
TLDR
Results are given on the joint effect of radiation exposure and cigarette smoking on lung cancer risks among A-bomb survivors, based on 592 cases through 1994, and the smoking relative risk is now similar to that found in Western populations.
Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts
TLDR
The results support the linearity of the radiation dose response for breast cancer, highlight the importance of age and age at exposure on the risks, and suggest a similarity in risks for acute and fractionated high-dose-rate exposures with much smaller effects from low- dose-rate protracted exposures.
Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990
TLDR
There are large differences in the relative frequency of different cancers by world area, and tobacco smoking and chewing are almost certainly the major preventable causes of cancer today.
Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987.
This paper presents an analysis of data on the incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors during the period from late 1950 through the end of
Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.
TLDR
Comparison of ESD and radiographic technique with CEC quality criteria highlighted a need for reduction of dose to infants and implied an increase in tube filtration might overcome the limitations of the room's three-phase, 12-pulse generator, allowing higher tube potentials to be used on infants.
...
...