Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: Comment

@article{Harrison2004RiskAA,
  title={Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: Comment},
  author={Glenn W. Harrison and Eric J. Johnson and Melayne Morgan Mcinnes and Elisabet E. Rutstr{\"o}m},
  journal={Behavioral \& Experimental Economics},
  year={2004}
}
Holt and Laury, AER 2002, develop an experimental design to determine the risk aversion of an individual. They use their observations to argue that increased incentives appear to change risk attitudes, leading to greater risk aversion. However, their main treatment, the effects of scaling up the stakes of the lottery choice task, is confounded by a simple order effect. We extend their design to test for these order effects, and show that they are indeed significant. The size of the stakes still… 

Risk preference elicitation without the confounding effect of probability weighting

In this paper we show that the wildly popular Holt and Laury (2002) risk preference elicitation method confounds estimates of the curvature of the utility function, the traditional notion of risk

The Effect of Payment Methods on Risk Aversion

Risk aversion experiments such as those by Holt and Laury (2002, 2005) measure risk aversion by examining subjects’ responses to a series of probability-ordered choices. Subjects are paid real money

Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Incentivization and the Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Risk Aversion

We study how the use of real and hypothetical choices to elicit risk preferences affect the statistical relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Our experimental results suggest that

ON THE LINKAGE BETWEEN FINANCIAL RISK TOLERANCE AND RISK AVERSION

We explore the linkage between financial risk tolerance (FRT) and risk aversion. To do this, we obtain FRT scores from a psychometrically validated survey and conduct a battery of online lottery

Contests as Selection Mechanisms: The Impact of Risk Aversion

Measuring Risk Aversion Model-Independently

We propose a new method to elicit individuals' risk preferences. Similar to Holt and Laury (2002), we use a simple multiple price-list format. However, our method is based on a general notion of

Risk aversion and framing effects

We present a new experimental evidence of how framing affects decisions in the context of a lottery choice experiment for measuring risk aversion. We investigate framing effects by replicating the

Risk aversion and framing effects

We present a new experimental evidence of how framing affects decisions in the context of a lottery choice experiment for measuring risk aversion. We investigate framing effects by replicating the

On the role of monetary incentives in risk preference elicitation experiments

Incentivized experiments in which individuals receive monetary rewards according to the outcomes of their decisions are regarded as the gold standard for preference elicitation in experimental

Risk Aversion and Information Acquisition Across Real and Hypothetical Settings

Estimating risk attitudes about choices with large stakes remains problematic. Using hypothetical choices with large stakes is one possible solution to the dilemma, but there is some evidence to
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES

Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

A menu of paired lottery choices is structured so that the crossover point to the high-risk lottery can be used to infer the degree of risk aversion. With normal laboratory payoffs of several

Individual Choice and Risk Aversion in the Laboratory : A Reconsideration by

Experimental methods have been used to examine individual choices for consistency with expected utility theory (EUT). However, previous designs have not accounted for an important free parameter in

Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences

The main results based on exponential discounting are robust to alternative specifications such as hyperbolic discounting and have direct implications for attempts to elicit time preferences, as well as debates over the appropriate domain of the utility function when characterizing risk aversion and time consistency.

Elicitation using multiple price list formats

We examine the properties of a popular method for eliciting choices and values from experimental subjects, the multiple price list format. The main advantage of this format is that it is relatively

Preferences Over Social Risk

We elicit individual preferences over social risk. We identify the extent to which these preferences are correlated with preferences over individual risk and the well-being of others. We examine

Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study

An extension to Ellsberg's experiment demonstrates that attitudes to ambiguity and compound objective lotteries are tightly associated. The sample is decomposed into three main groups: subjective

Risk Aversion and Embedding Bias

In Selten (1967) “Strategy Method,” the second mover in the game submits a complete strategy. This basic idea has been exported to nonstrategic experiments, where a participant reports a complete

Lost in State Space: Are Preferences Stable?

We use field experiments to examine the temporal stability of risk preferences. Over a 17-month period, we elicited risk preferences from subjects chosen to be representative of the adult Danish

Averting Risk in the Face of Large Losses: Bernoulli Vs. Tversky and Kahneman

Prospect Theory asserts that people display risk attraction in high-probability losses. But our subjects tend to avoid fair risks for large ([euro]30 to [euro]90), high-probability (80%) real losses,

Temporal stability of estimates of risk aversion

Estimates of risk aversion can be obtained from controlled laboratory experiments. The temporal stability of those preferences is assumed in many applications. This assumption is tested by eliciting