Right versus left radial artery access for coronary procedures: an international collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis including 5 randomized trials and 3210 patients.

@article{BiondiZoccai2013RightVL,
  title={Right versus left radial artery access for coronary procedures: an international collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis including 5 randomized trials and 3210 patients.},
  author={Giuseppe G. L. Biondi-Zoccai and Alessandro Sciahbasi and Vicente Bod{\'i} and Javier Fern{\'a}ndez-Portales and Yumiko Kanei and Enrico Romagnoli and Pierfrancesco Agostoni and Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi and Marzia Lotrionte and Maria Grazia Modena},
  journal={International journal of cardiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={166 3},
  pages={621-6}
}
BACKGROUND Radial artery access is a mainstay in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. However, there is uncertainty on the comparison of right versus left radial access for coronary procedures. We thus undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing right versus left radial access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures. METHODS Pertinent studies were searched in CENTRAL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus, together with international… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 extracted citations

Comparative efficacy and safety of the left versus right radial approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis including 6870 patients

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas • 2015
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…