Rhetorical figures as argument schemes - The proleptic suite

  title={Rhetorical figures as argument schemes - The proleptic suite},
  author={Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher},
  journal={Argument Comput.},
Identifying rhetorical figures with marginal to non-existent lexico-syntactic signatures poses significant challenges for computational approaches reliant upon structural definitions or descriptions. One such figure is prolepsis (πρóληψις ), which this essay charts out in some detail, addressing the challenges and the benefits of rendering such figures computationally tractable through the use of argument schemes with attention to metadiscursive or macro-discursive norms offered by… 
An annotation scheme for Rhetorical Figures
This paper highlights certain rhetorical devices that encode levels of meaning that have been overlooked in Computational Linguistics generally and Argument Mining particularly, and yet lend themselves to automated detection, the linguistic configurations known as Rhetorical Figures.
Some Argumentative Uses of the Rhetorical Figure of Antithesis in Environmental Science Policy Articles
This paper presents examples of the figure of antithesis in five environmental science policy journal articles and describes their argumentative functions. The examples include not just contrasting
Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining
The rhetorical schemes used for argument mining are presented, as well as some suggestions for novel argument schemes based on the ontological approach to rhetorical figuration.
Argumentation schemes in AI: A literature review. Introduction to the special issue
Presumptive reasoning, according to the analysis given in this book, is based on pragmatic implicatures drawn out by a hearer on the basis of what a Speaker’s remarks suggest, as opposed to logical inferences that necessarily follow from what a speaker asserts.
On Scientific Enquiry and Computational Argumentation
In this speculative paper we discuss how existing work in formal argumentation can support the creation of a Regulæ Philosophandi Ratiocinator, i.e. a machinery implementing general principles of
Arguments in Gradatio , Incrementum and Climax ; a Climax Ontology
A novel suite of ontologies that describe Climax, a compound rhetorical figure that includes Incrementum and Gradatio, which produces a complex argument structure where overlapping series generate multiple, reinforcing claims.
Recognizing rhetoric in science policy arguments
An in-depth analysis of argumentation and rhetorical devices in two journal articles on climate change issues is presented to gain a better understanding of use of rhetorical devices as a prerequisite for designing and building a rhetorically-annotated digital corpus of full-text science policy articles.
AI for Social Justice: New Methodological Horizons in Technical Communication
Using a preexisting dataset investigating patient marginalization in pharmaceuticals policy discourse, 49 machine learning systems designed to identify and track rhetorical features of interest were built and tested.
Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics
  • N. Green
  • Computer Science
    Argument Comput.
  • 2021
This paper describes each of the various projects: the methods, the argument schemes that were identified, and how they were used, and a synthesis of the results is given with a discussion of open issues.
Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion
A threefold model for the interrelation of emotion and time in argumentation is outlined and an analysis of a speech delivered by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic is illustrated.


Constructing a Rhetorical Figuration Ontology
The goal is to combine linguistic and rhetorical theories with discourse analysis and machine learning to develop formal models of computational rhetoric that may be usefully applied in real-world Computational Linguistics systems.
The RhetFig Project: Computational Rhetorics and Models of Persuasion
The work of the RhetFig Project is described, which has so far included development of a comprehensive theorized ontology of figures, the first ever based on cognitive principles, and computational applications of the ontology.
Prolepsis: Dealing with Multiple Viewpoints in Argument
This paper examines the argumentation strategy prolepsis: anticipating and subsequently responding to an argument before it has been made. Although prolepsis is common to a variety of arguments, it
Rhetorical figures in science
Rhetorical Figures in Science breaks new ground in the rhetorical study of scientific argument as the first book to demonstrate how figures of speech other than metaphor have been used to accomplish
Preface: From Pragmatics and Dialectics to Argument Studies
Abstract Pragmatics and dialectics are two disciplines which have been amongst the first and most important partners for argument studies in the exploration of the complex realm of communication.
A handlist of rhetorical terms
The Second Edition of this widely used work provides in one convenient, accessible volume all the rhetorical terms that students of Western literature and rhetoric are likely to come across in their reading or to find useful in their writing.
On rhetoric : a theory of civic discourse
Based on careful study of the Greek text and informed by the best modern scholarship, the second edition of this highly acclaimed translation offers the most faithful English version ever published
Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions
The paper shows how argumentation schemes and critical questions should be fitted into the technique of argument diagramming using the Araucaria software system, and discusses several problems arising from the need to deal with enthymemes.
Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications
A schematised superstructure of the arguments from the corpus is presented, charting the configurations of stylistic features, which signal the elements of this superstructure, epistemic topoi.
Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method
  • D. Walton
  • Philosophy
    Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell.
  • 2012
The paper shows how schemes need to be formed into clusters of sub-schemes work toward a classification system of schemes from the bottom up, and how identification conditions for each scheme can be helpful for argument extraction.