Rewarding Peer Reviewers: Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication


This article overviews currently available options for rewarding peer reviewers. Rewards and incentives may help maintain the quality and integrity of scholarly publications. Publishers around the world implemented a variety of financial and nonfinancial mechanisms for incentivizing their best reviewers. None of these is proved effective on its own. A… (More)
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.360



Citations per Year

Citation Velocity: 24

Averaging 24 citations per year over the last 3 years.

Learn more about how we calculate this metric in our FAQ.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Gasparyan2015RewardingPR, title={Rewarding Peer Reviewers: Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication}, author={Armen Yuri Gasparyan and Alexey N Gerasimov and Alexander A Voronov and George D Kitas}, booktitle={Journal of Korean medical science}, year={2015} }