Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation.

@article{Gordon2010RevisedAP,
  title={Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation.},
  author={D. Gordon and R. Polomano and T. Pellino and D. Turk and L. McCracken and G. Sherwood and J. Paice and M. Wallace and S. Strassels and J. Farrar},
  journal={The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society},
  year={2010},
  volume={11 11},
  pages={
          1172-86
        }
}
UNLABELLED Quality improvement (QI) is a compilation of methods adapted from psychology, statistics, and operations research to identify factors that contribute to poor treatment outcomes and to design solutions for improvement. [...] Key Method An interdisciplinary task force of the APS used a step-wise, empiric approach to revise, test, and examine psychometric properties of the society's original POQ.Expand
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain
TLDR
The modified Danish version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for the five subscales pain severity (pain), perception of care (satisfaction), pain interference with function (activity) and emotions (emotion), side effects of treatment (safety), but not for the patient-barrier subscale for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain. Expand
Patients' perception of postoperative pain management: validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire.
TLDR
The psychometric quality of the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire can be regarded as satisfactory, which provides the basis for the first comprehensive postoperative pain registry in Europe and other countries. Expand
The Quality Test for Postoperative Pain Management using the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire Revisied (APS-POQ-R) version Indonesia at Mohammad Hoesin Hospital in Palembang (A study of the quality level of postoperative pain management
Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. APS-POQ-R (Revised American Pain Society PatientExpand
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire concerning pain management in Chinese orthopedic patients
TLDR
Results showed that APS-POQ-R-C has satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity, although some items are not appropriate for orthopedic patients, and is therefore recommended for pain management in future studies. Expand
Evaluate construct validity of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in gynecological postoperative patients using confirmatory factor analysis
TLDR
Evidence is provided to support the use of APS-POQ-R as a measurement tool for pain management evaluation in acute postoperative patients with a multi-cultural background and demonstrates that a five-factor structure of the APs-POq-R is the best fitting model in the patient sample. Expand
Cross-cultural examination of the structure of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).
TLDR
The APS-POQ-R was revealed as a valid measure of postoperative pain experience for Danish and Australian patients and measures of patients' perception of pain management were not robust to group differences in treatment expectations and demonstrated cross-cultural instability. Expand
An initial psychometric evaluation of the APS-POQ-R in acute pain presenting to the emergency department.
TLDR
The Questionnaire has demonstrable construct validity in adult patients presenting with acute pain to the ED and demonstrated discriminatory ability based on patient urgency, and subscale measurement was associated with patient satisfaction with care. Expand
The Pediatric American Pain Society Patient Outcomes Questionnaire (Pediatric APS-POQ): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief and Comprehensive Measure of Pain and Pain Outcomes in Hospitalized Youth.
TLDR
Initial psychometric testing of the Pediatric American Pain Society Patient Outcomes Questionnaire (Pediatric APS-POQ) provided a brief but comprehensive assessment of pain and pain outcomes in hospitalized children and adolescents, which will allow for greater individualization in hospital-based pain management and quality improvement purposes. Expand
Assessment of patient satisfaction with acute pain management service: Monitoring quality of care in clinical setting
TLDR
The survey of patients′ satisfaction to monitor the quality of care provided by APMS provided positive inputs on its role and also helps to identify areas requiring improvement in care and as a tool to gauge thequality of care. Expand
How Simple Can it Get? Measuring Pain With NRS Items or Binary Items
TLDR
Comparison of binary answers with NRS answers can improve the understanding of the clinical relevance of patients’ statements and was proven to be a practical alternative to the NRS format for a screening instrument. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES
Using the American Pain Society's patient outcome questionnaire to evaluate the quality of postoperative pain management in a sample of Norwegian patients.
TLDR
Results from a sample of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery suggest that undertreatment of pain persists across the first 5 postoperative days and that pain's level of interference with function decreases significantly between the third and fifth postoperativeDays. Expand
Developing and testing a questionnaire to assess the quality of pain management in acute care in Sweden.
TLDR
The questionnaire is considered to be a useful, reliable, and valid self-report tool to assess the quality of pain management in acute care and a few items need to be refined, tested, and evaluated in future research. Expand
Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. American Pain Society Quality of Care Committee.
TLDR
Quality improvement programs to improve treatment of acute pain and cancer pain should include five key elements: ensuring that a report of unrelieved pain raises a "red flag" that attracts clinicians' attention, and coordinating and assessing implementation of these measures. Expand
Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for Use in Documenting the Outcomes of Patients With Noncancer Pain
TLDR
Results support the validity of the BPI as a measure of pain in patients without cancer and, in particular, as aMeasure of pain for arthritis and LBP patients. Expand
American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force.
TLDR
Efforts to improve the quality of pain management must move beyond assessment and communication of pain to implementation and evaluation of improvements in pain treatment that are timely, safe, evidence based, and multimodal. Expand
Pain management outcomes for hospitalized Hispanic patients.
TLDR
Outcomes of pain management and predictors of patient satisfaction in a minority sample of Hispanic inpatients and the emergence of Hispanics as the fastest growing minority group increases the need for research regarding pain management outcomes to plan more effective intervention. Expand
Assessing clinical outcomes: patient satisfaction with pain management.
TLDR
This study examined the recently revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ), particularly in regard to results from newly added items and overall reliability and validity, and found that younger patients were more likely to want more pain medication. Expand
Patient satisfaction and pain severity as outcomes in pain management: a longitudinal view of one setting's experience.
TLDR
It is postulated that patients are satisfied even though they are in pain because they experience a commonly expected peak and trough pattern of pain relief, a pattern that occurs with "as needed" administration. Expand
A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
TLDR
Although there are no perfect measures of quality, longitudinal data support the validity of a core set of indicators that could be used to obtain benchmark data for quality improvement in pain management in the hospital setting. Expand
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
TLDR
Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of Chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...