Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.

@article{Lee2014ReviewOM,
  title={Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.},
  author={Andrew Wen-Tseng Lee},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2014},
  volume={67 2},
  pages={
          138-43
        }
}
OBJECTIVES To identify and summarize published systematic reviews that report results of meta-analyses that combined direct and indirect comparisons. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Narrative review of mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) reported in systematic reviews of health interventions. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, CINAHL, DARE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and SIGLE were searched for reviews published up to June 2012 in which a meta-analysis had been conducted that… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

Briefing paper for methods review working party on mixed treatment comparisons

R Trowman, A Stevens, P Tappenden
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
  • 2011

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…