Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain

@article{Blank2002ReviewOJ,
  title={Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain},
  author={Robert H. Blank},
  journal={The American Journal of Bioethics},
  year={2002},
  volume={2},
  pages={69 - 70}
}
  • R. Blank
  • Published 2002
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
(2002). Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 69-70. 
52 Citations

Topics from this paper

Semantic dualism and narrative identity—Paul Ricœur on the cognitive sciences
TLDR
The essential traits of the philosophical paradigm at the basis of Ricœur’s view of the cognitive sciences are sketched and a distinction between two different kinds of discourse which express two different views on the world in general and the body in particular is explained. Expand
Neuroethics as a Brain-Based Philosophy of Life: The Case of Michael S. Gazzaniga
Michael S. Gazzaniga, a pioneer and world leader in cognitive neuroscience, has made an initial attempt to develop neuroethics into a brain-based philosophy of life that he hopes will replace theExpand
Missing the revolution : Darwinism for social scientists
1. Introduction: Sometimes the Bus Does Wait PART I: GENDER 2. Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology 3. The Male Flash of Anger: Violent Response to Transgression as an Example of the Intersection ofExpand
A Discussion with D.M. Armstrong about the Nexus between Philosophy and Psychiatry
Objective: To explore practical issues in the Mind-Body Problem through a discussion with philosopher D.M. Armstrong. Conclusions: Debate about the Mind-Body Problem stretches from the Ancient GreeksExpand
Jean-Pierre Changeux on how and why our brains enable us to make judgments about what is good, true or beautiful
  • E. Leigh
  • Sociology
  • Evolution: Education and Outreach
  • 2015
Book detailsThe Good, the True and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach, by Jean-Pierre Changeux. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press and Paris: Editions Odile Jacob. 2012. pp. xii + 386. ISBNExpand
Philosophical implications of neuroscience: The space for a critique
In an intellectual atmosphere still marked by the ideological failures of the twentieth century, the expectations for neuroscience are extremely high, even in fields traditionally sheltered from theExpand
Hermeneutics and Truth: From Alētheia to Attestation
This essay aims to correct a prevalent misconception about Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics, which understands it to support a conception of human understanding as finite as Heidegger did, but in a moreExpand
Moralizing biology
In recent years, a proliferation of books about empathy, cooperation and pro-social behaviours (Brooks, 2011a) has significantly influenced the discourse of the life-sciences and reversedExpand
Space and Narrative: Ricoeur and a Hermeneutic Reading of Place
In this contribution I apply Ricoeur’s hermeneutics to the topic of place, arguing that place is always interpreted and that there is a hermeneutic tension between “metaphorical” and “physical”Expand
New theories of mind and their implications for researching histories
ABSTRACT By considering new scholarship on the social distribution of cognition, artificial intelligence (AI) and philosophies of mind, this article suggests another epistemology for research inExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
Brain Policy
Robert Blank is a political scientist who writes as an informed layman in neuroscience for “anyone who has an interest in the broader social implications of research and applications in the brain”.Expand
Time And Narrative
In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature. This final volume, a comprehensiveExpand