Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain

@article{Blank2002ReviewOJ,
  title={Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain},
  author={Robert H. Blank},
  journal={The American Journal of Bioethics},
  year={2002},
  volume={2},
  pages={69 - 70}
}
  • R. Blank
  • Published 1 September 2002
  • Philosophy, Art, Psychology
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
(2002). Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 69-70. 
57 Citations

Semantic dualism and narrative identity—Paul Ricœur on the cognitive sciences

TLDR
The essential traits of the philosophical paradigm at the basis of Ricœur’s view of the cognitive sciences are sketched and a distinction between two different kinds of discourse which express two different views on the world in general and the body in particular is explained.

Neuroethics as a Brain-Based Philosophy of Life: The Case of Michael S. Gazzaniga

Michael S. Gazzaniga, a pioneer and world leader in cognitive neuroscience, has made an initial attempt to develop neuroethics into a brain-based philosophy of life that he hopes will replace the

Missing the revolution : Darwinism for social scientists

TLDR
This chapter discusses Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology, Primatology, Evolution, Agency and Sociology, and the impact of Primatologists on the Study of Human Society.

Hermeneutical crisis as rethinking the humanities: the question of the trace – traces of the past, cortical traces

In this article, I would like to highlight Ricoeur’s manner of rethinking the humanities, by focusing on a particular case, namely his hermeneutical reading of the question of trace. Taking into

A Discussion with D.M. Armstrong about the Nexus between Philosophy and Psychiatry

Objective: To explore practical issues in the Mind-Body Problem through a discussion with philosopher D.M. Armstrong. Conclusions: Debate about the Mind-Body Problem stretches from the Ancient Greeks

Jean-Pierre Changeux on how and why our brains enable us to make judgments about what is good, true or beautiful

  • E. Leigh
  • History
    Evolution: Education and Outreach
  • 2015
Book detailsThe Good, the True and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach, by Jean-Pierre Changeux. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press and Paris: Editions Odile Jacob. 2012. pp. xii + 386. ISBN

Philosophical implications of neuroscience: The space for a critique

In an intellectual atmosphere still marked by the ideological failures of the twentieth century, the expectations for neuroscience are extremely high, even in fields traditionally sheltered from the

Hermeneutics and Truth: From Alētheia to Attestation

This essay aims to correct a prevalent misconception about Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics, which understands it to support a conception of human understanding as finite as Heidegger did, but in a more

Moralizing biology

In recent years, a proliferation of books about empathy, cooperation and pro-social behaviours (Brooks, 2011a) has significantly influenced the discourse of the life-sciences and reversed

Space and Narrative: Ricoeur and a Hermeneutic Reading of Place

In this contribution I apply Ricoeur’s hermeneutics to the topic of place, arguing that place is always interpreted and that there is a hermeneutic tension between “metaphorical” and “physical”
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES

Brain Policy

Robert Blank is a political scientist who writes as an informed layman in neuroscience for “anyone who has an interest in the broader social implications of research and applications in the brain”.

Time And Narrative

In the first two volumes of this work, Paul Ricoeur examined the relations between time and narrative in historical writing, fiction, and theories of literature. This final volume, a comprehensive

The self and its brain

PART I by Karl R. Popper, Chapter P1: Materialism Transcends Itself, Chapter P2: The Worlds 1, 2 and 3, Chapter P3: Materialism Criticized, Chapter P4: Some Remarks on the Self, Chapter P5: