• Corpus ID: 990913

Review of James Woodward, Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation

@inproceedings{Glymour2004ReviewOJ,
  title={Review of James Woodward, Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation},
  author={Clark Glymour},
  year={2004}
}
Despite its clarity and eloquence, Woodward’s wonderful book does not wear its virtues on its sleeve. You need the whole shirt. I aim to let those virtues show a bit more, and that requires some background to explain what Woodward has accomplished. Philosophical theories come chiefly in two flavors, Socratic and Euclidean. Socratic philosophical theories, whose paradigm is The Meno, advance an analysis (sometimes called an ‘explication’), a set of purportedly necessary and sufficient conditions… 
How agency can solve interventionism’s problem of circularity
TLDR
An overview of relevant empirical evidence from developmental psychology is presented which shows that the proposed rational reconstruction lines up neatly with the actual development of causal reasoning in children, which gives additional plausibility to the proposal.
Of brains and planets: on a causal criterion for mind-brain identities
TLDR
The causal criterion which Glymour proposes does not provide a sufficient condition for the local identification of properties, and his account does not succeed in rendering local mind-brain identities empirically testable, so the mind-body problem cannot be solved as easily as Glymours assumes.
Intervening on structure
TLDR
This work suggests interpreting counterfactual questions involving structural features as questions about alternative parameter settings of causal models, and proposes an extension of the usual interventionist framework for causal explanation which enables scientists to explore the consequences of interventions on “macro-level” structure.
Interdefining Causation and Intervention
Non-reductive interventionist theories of causation and methodologies of causal reasoning embedded in that theoretical framework have become increasingly popular in recent years. This paper argues
Can Interventionists Be Neo-Russellians? Interventionism, the Open Systems Argument, and the Arrow of Entropy
Several proponents of the interventionist theory of causation have recently argued for a neo-Russellian account of causation. The article discusses two strategies for interventionists to be
Direct Causes and the Trouble with Soft Interventions
An interventionist account of causation characterizes causal relations in terms of changes resulting from particular interventions. I provide a new example of a causal relation for which there does
Green and grue causal variables
TLDR
This article explores the set of causal variables that function as relata in these axioms and extends Spirtes’ result to the general framework of linear structural equation models and explores to what extent the possibility to intervene or a preference for simpler causal systems may help in selecting among sets of causal variable.
Causation 1
TLDR
A virtual plethora of theories of causation have been championed in the third of a century between 1970 and 2004 and can be coherently debated without some theory of causation.
Direct Cause Direct Cause
An interventionist account of causation characterizes causal relations in terms of changes resulting from particular interventions. We provide an example of a causal relation for which there does not

References

SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers
I congratulate my friend Paul Holland on his lucidly clear description of the basic perspective for causal inference referred to as Rubin's model. I have been advocating this general perspective for
Causation, prediction, and search
TLDR
The authors axiomatize the connection between causal structure and probabilistic independence, explore several varieties of causal indistinguishability, formulate a theory of manipulation, and develop asymptotically reliable procedures for searching over equivalence classes of causal models.
Causation, Prediction, and Search
TLDR
Although Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence has some weaknesses, it is a useful reference for those interested in the question of equivalence testing, particularly in biological applications.
Learning Measurement Models for Unobserved Variables
TLDR
This work introduces an algorithm for discovering partitions of observed variables such that members of a class share only a single latent common cause and requires no prior knowledge of the number of latent variables, and does not depend on the mathematical form of the relationships among the latent variables.
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems
Decomposable graphs and hypergraphs
On definit et on etudie la notion d'hypergraphe decomposable en montrant qu'un tel hypergraphe est toujours conforme
Structural Analysis of Multivariate Data: A Review