Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall

  title={Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall},
  author={Fohn M. Gardiner and Fergus I. M. Craik and Fraser A. Bleasdale},
  journal={Memory \& Cognition},
The notion that difficult initial retrieval facilitates subsequent recall was tested in a situation similar to Brown and McNeill’s (1966) tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) paradigm. After 50 trials, Ss were unexpectedly asked to recall all the target words. It was found that words retrieved with difficulty in the definition session were relatively well recalled in the final test. Further analyses revealed that the critical factor for good recall was the presence of a TOT state, or a strong feeling of… 
Retrieval latency and “at-risk” memories
The results are consistent with the classical view of latency as a measure of trace strength and stand in sharp contrast with results reported by Benjamin, Bjork, and Schwartz (1998) that showed that fast retrievals from semantic memory were more poorly retained than slower ones.
Effects of Opportunities for Word Retrieval During Second Language Vocabulary Learning
Research suggests that memory for an item improves when one is allowed to retrieve the item (Slamecka & Graf, 1978). This study explored benefits of providing opportunities for target-word retrieval
Analysis of search times in paired associates learning
It was tentatively suggested that a long unsuccessful search on Trial n of a paired associate task might be associated with a higher probability of recall on Trial n + 1 than would a short search.
The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.
In each of 3 experiments, participants' predictions of their own future recall performance were examined under conditions in which probability or speed of retrieval at one time or on one task is known to be negatively related to retrieval probability on a later task.
Retrieval attempts enhance learning regardless of time spent trying to retrieve
During the initial retrieval attempt, more time did increase recall, suggesting that participants continued to engage in productive retrieval activities when given more time.
Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism
These findings argue that retrieval-induced forgetting is not caused by increased competition arising from the strengthening of practiced items, but by inhibitory processes specific to the situation of recall.