Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect.

@article{Karpicke2010RetrievalMD,
  title={Retrieval Mode Distinguishes the Testing Effect from the Generation Effect.},
  author={Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Franklin Zaromb},
  journal={Journal of Memory and Language},
  year={2010},
  volume={62},
  pages={227-239}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying
TLDR
It is confirmed that initial testing promotes later retrieval relative to restudying, and it is suggested that adopting pre-retrieval processing in the forms of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation might contribute to these memory enhancements.
The Role of Episodic Context in Retrieval Practice Effects
The episodic context account of retrieval-based learning proposes that retrieval enhances subsequent retention because people must think back to and reinstate a prior learning context. Three
The influence of intentional versus incidental retrieval practices on the role of recollection in test-enhanced learning
A testing effect occurs when taking a test leads to more durable memory for tested materials, relative to restudying them during the same period of time. In the current study, we examined whether
Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals
TLDR
This study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds in a bifurcated item-distribution model.
Does Providing Prompts During Retrieval Practice Improve Learning
Summary The purpose of this investigation was to identify ways to prompt retrieval practice to make recall even more effective at producing meaningful learning. In two experiments, subjects read
The Testing Effect and Far Transfer: The Role of Exposure to Key Information
TLDR
The results of the present experiments demonstrate that Butler’s (2010) testing effect in far transfer is robust and focused exposure to key information appears to be a significant factor in this far transfer testing effect.
Attention and the testing effect.
TLDR
Final recall was substantially reduced by DA in the restudy condition but not in the retrieval condition, and this pattern was found for related and unrelated word pairs, with feedback during retrieval practice and without, for immediate as well as delayed final tests.
Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval
TLDR
Results suggest that, under specific circumstances, overt retrieval may lead to a greater testing effect than that of covert retrieval, but because of small effect sizes, it appears that the testing effect is mainly the result of retrieval processes and that articulation has fairly little to add to its magnitude in a paired-associate learning paradigm.
The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: The roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization
TLDR
Stable recall in repeated retrieval was accompanied by strong and sustained conceptual organization, whereas organization for repeated study was tenuous and weakened across tests.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
The influence of retrieval on retention
TLDR
The results reject the hypothesis that a successful retrieval is beneficial only to the extent that it provides another study experience, as performing a memory retrieval (TTST condition) led to better performance than pure study (pure ST condition).
Generation effects in free recall: further support for a three-factor theory.
TLDR
A framework is presented that helps explain and predict generation effects in free recall (for between-subjects manipulations of generating vs. reading) and, when shared information (among targets) was salient, generation effects were found under encoding conditions that can disruptgeneration effects in cued recall.
Generation effects and the lack thereof: the role of transfer-appropriate processing.
TLDR
Manipulations of identical stimulus materials forced subjects to process different types of information in order to generate targets, producing a striking reversal in the relative levels of free recall and cued recall for targets that had been generated vs. read, and lending strong support to the transfer-appropriate processing aspect of the proposed framework for explaining generation effects.
Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
  • Shana K. Carpenter
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2009
TLDR
Results indicate that the activation of elaborative information-which would occur to a greater extent during testing than restudying--may be one mechanism that underlies the testing effect.
Generation Effects and the Lack Thereof: The Role of Transfer-appropriate Processing
We report two experiments designed to test a multifactor transfer-appropriate processing explanation of generation effects, and the lack thereof, in free recall and cued recall. The basic argument is
The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon
Five experiments are reported comparing memory for words that were generated by the subjects themselves with the same words when they were simply presented to be read. In all cases, performance in
The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.
  • D. J. Burns
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 1990
TLDR
It is argued that a multifactor account is needed to explain the findings of the generation effect, which suggests better memory for internally generated items than for externally presented items.
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
TLDR
This paper describes and evaluates explanations offered by these theories to account for the effect of extralist cuing, facilitation of recall of list items by nonlist items.
...
...