Rethinking Linguistic Relativity

@article{Gumperz1991RethinkingLR,
  title={Rethinking Linguistic Relativity},
  author={John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson},
  journal={Current Anthropology},
  year={1991},
  volume={32},
  pages={613 - 623}
}
Volume 32, Number 5, December r991 1613 Javanese respond to them. That's crazy! That can't be what's going on. I'm not sure you can ever have a Ja­ vanese response to Javanese art if you're not Javanese­ maybe you can if you spend ten years there, but you can't do it by watching a wayang show. So then there's the question of annotations, and trying to figure out how to get the real stuff across. There's a lot of concern about that. RH: You've written extensively on other conceptions of sel£hood… 
Linguistic Relativity
Article descriptor: Languages differ dramatically from one another in terms of how they describe the world. Does having different ways of describing the world lead speakers of different languages
The 'secret rules of language':Tackling pragmatics in the classroom
In this article, I would like to focus on how we can help learners to understand what one exasperated student once referred to as ‘the secret rules of language’ (Bardovi-Harlig 2001), that is the
Linguistic Relativity Does Language Shape Thought?
Languages differ dramatically from one another in terms of how they describe the world. Does having different ways of describing the world lead speakers of different languages also to have different
Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought
The idea that language shapes the way we think, often associated with Benjamin Whorf, has long been decried as not only wrong but also fundamentally wrong-headed. Yet, experimental evidence has
Do We Know More About Whorf
The idea that different languages foster different world views in their speakers is part of a tradition popularized by Wilhelm von Humboldt in the 18th century long before it became associated with
Linguistic relativity from reference to agency
How are language, thought, and reality related? Interdisciplinary research on this question over the past two decades has made significant progress. Most of the work has been Neo-Whorfian in two
WHORF'S CHILDREN: CRITICAL COMMENTS ON CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (CDA)
CDA has been a frequent topic at BAAL and AILA. Yet one critic, basically sympathetic (Stubbs 1994), comments on "major unresolved criticisms of its data and theory", while another, much less
Linguistic Relativity And Its Relation To Analytic Philosophy
The history of so-called ‘linguistic relativity’ is an odd and multifaceted one. After knowing alternate fortunes and being treated by different academic branches, today there are some new ways of
Discourse Analysis: The State of the Art
In this essay I give an overview of approaches to discourse analysis, trying to point out interesting new perspectives on the one hand and older research methods on the other. In chapter 2 my
...
...