• DOI:10.1080/07393148.2012.729744
• Corpus ID: 143485932

Rethinking Anti-Immigration Rhetoric after the Oslo and Utøya Terror Attacks

@article{Wiggen2012RethinkingAR,
  title={Rethinking Anti-Immigration Rhetoric after the Oslo and Ut{\o}ya Terror Attacks},
  author={Mette Wiggen},
  journal={New Political Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={34},
  pages={585 - 604}
}

• Mette Wiggen
• Published 1 December 2012
• Political Science, Sociology
• New Political Science

This article examines right-wing populism and populist rhetoric in Norway preceding the July 22, 2011 terror attacks at Utøya and in Oslo. It describes how the mainstream media, academics, and political parties have appealed to the public in an increasingly populist fashion and have spread fear about immigration, immigrants, and integration. It argues that while the populist right-wing Progress Party has adopted immigration and integration as its main cause and has gained support because of it, the Progress Party alone cannot be blamed for the widespread xenophobia in Norway. The media are also responsible for the way immigration, culture, and race have been reported, as are a wide range of politicians for formulating increasingly stricter immigration policies. In the aftermath of July 22 politicians became acutely concerned about their own anti-immigrant rhetoric and how it may have influenced the terrorist Anders Behring Breivik. A broad consensus to address and change the language used in the immigration debate was agreed upon; more openness and more democracy was promised. Much has changed, but even more has stayed the same in Norwegian politics and attitudes to immigration and Islam.