Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC”

@article{Tarazona2017ResponseTT,
  title={Response to the reply by C. J. Portier and P. Clausing, concerning our review “Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC”},
  author={Jos{\'e} Vicente Tarazona and Daniele Court-Marques and Manuela Tiramani and Hermine Reich and Rudolf Pfeil and Frederique Istace and Federica Crivellente},
  journal={Archives of Toxicology},
  year={2017},
  volume={91},
  pages={3199-3203}
}
commenting rounds and the public consultation (EFSA 2015b). Although our response will be restricted to the EFSA assessment presented in Tarazona et al. (2017), it is worth noting the similarities in term of complementarity and transparency between the EFSA process under the pesticides regulation and the ECHA process under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Germany as RMS under the Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 (Germany 2015) and Dossier Submitter under the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (BAuA 2016… CONTINUE READING