Response to the letter to the editor by Lin and Kao

Abstract

Sir, We are grateful for the opportunity to respond to the letter from Drs. Lin and Kao. We thank them for their interest and insightful comments regarding our paper. The following is our response to their comments. Drs. Lin and Kao consider that the in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate we observed is too low in comparison with the ISR rate of from 10% to 43… (More)
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0296-z

Topics

Cite this paper

@article{Kazekawa2007ResponseTT, title={Response to the letter to the editor by Lin and Kao}, author={Kiyoshi Kazekawa}, journal={Neuroradiology}, year={2007}, volume={49}, pages={867-867} }