• Corpus ID: 14253962

Response to Liu, Xu, and Liang (2015) and Ferrer-i-Cancho and Gómez-Rodríguez (2015) on Dependency Length Minimization

  title={Response to Liu, Xu, and Liang (2015) and Ferrer-i-Cancho and G{\'o}mez-Rodr{\'i}guez (2015) on Dependency Length Minimization},
  author={Richard Futrell and Kyle Mahowald and Edward Gibson},
We address recent criticisms (Liu et al., 2015; Ferrer-i-Cancho and Gomez-Rodriguez, 2015) of our work on empirical evidence of dependency length minimization across languages (Futrell et al., 2015). First, we acknowledge error in failing to acknowledge Liu (2008)'s previous work on corpora of 20 languages with similar aims. A correction will appear in PNAS. Nevertheless, we argue that our work provides novel, strong evidence for dependency length minimization as a universal quantitative… 

Figures from this paper



Dependency Length Minimization: Puzzles and Promises

In the recent issue of PNAS, Futrell et al. claims that their study of 37 languages gives the first large scale cross-language evidence for Dependency Length Minimization, which is an overstatement

Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages

Using parsed corpora of 37 diverse languages, it is shown that overall dependency lengths for all languages are shorter than conservative random baselines, suggesting that dependency length minimization is a universal quantitative property of human languages.

Do Grammars Minimize Dependency Length?

A well-established principle of language is that there is a preference for closely related words to be close together in the sentence. This can be expressed as a preference for dependency length

Mildly Non-Projective Dependency Grammar

This article presents a formalism for non-projective dependency grammar in the framework of linear context-free rewriting systems, and shows that parsing with unrestricted grammars is intractable, and defines a class of “mildly” non- projective dependency Grammars that can be parsed in polynomial time.

Dependency Distance as a Metric of Language Comprehension Difficulty

The findings-that average dependency distance has a tendency to be minimized in human language and that there is a threshold of less than 3 words in average dependencydistance and grammar plays an important role in constraining distance-support all three hypotheses, although some questions are still open for further research.

Liberating Language Research from Dogmas of the 20th Century

A commentary on the article "Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages" by Futrell, Mahowald & Gibson (PNAS 2015 112 (33) 10336-10341).

Why do syntactic links not cross

It is concluded that links are unlikely to cross when drawn over the vertex sequence, suggesting that the uncommonness of crossings in the trees specifying the syntactic structure of sentences could be a side-effect of minimizing the Euclidean distance between syntactically related words.

Syntactic difficulty in English and Japanese: A textual study

This paper presents statistical analyses of the syntactic structures found in some spoken texts in English and Japanese. By studying the products of performance spoken English and Japanese texts in

Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements

A log slasher includes an elongated log receiving bunk and a saw assembly movable longitudinally along the bunk to saw logs supported in the bunk into shortened lengths. The saw is pivotally